American Navigation Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al

Filing 110

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 109 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Motion to Dismiss All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,902,347 and Proposed Order filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 20, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KALPANA SRINIVASAN (S.B. #237460)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, California 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-789-3150
[e-mail]
BARRY BARNETT (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
901 Main Street, Suite 5100
Dallas, Texas 75202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-754-1933
[e-mail]

9
10
11

MAX L. TRIBBLE, JR. (Pro Hac Vice)
JOSEPH S. GRINSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 713-654-6666
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
PATRICK C. BAGEANT (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206-516-3883
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff
AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, INC.
[Additional Counsel list on Signature
Page]

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18

AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS,
INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
24

v.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05298-JST
STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
ALL ASSERTED CLAIMS OF U.S.
PATENT NO. 5,902,347 AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 3:14-CV-05298-JST

1

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant American Navigation Systems, Inc. (“AmNav”) and

2

Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics

3

America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”)1 hereby submit this stipulated motion to dismiss and

4

proposed order.

5

WHEREAS, on March 6, 2015, Samsung, Apple Inc. (“Apple”), and non-party Google

6

Inc. filed two petitions with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for administrative

7

inter partes review of asserted U.S. Patent No. 5,902,347 (“’347 Patent”), numbered

8

IPR2015-00849 and IPR2015-00851.

9
10

WHEREAS, on September 20, 2016, the PTO issued its final decisions in both IPR
proceedings, cancelling all asserted claims of the ’347 Patent.

11

WHEREAS, AmNav did not appeal the PTAB’s decision to the Federal Circuit, and

12

the PTAB will therefore issue a certificate canceling the asserted claims of the ’347 Patent.

13
14

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between AmNav and Samsung,
and subject to the approval of the Court, that:

15

1.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, AmNav and Samsung hereby move for an order

16

dismissing AmNav’s claims in this case WITH PREJUDICE and Samsung’s counterclaims

17

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

18
19

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees associated

with the claims and counterclaims dismissed by this Stipulated Dismissal.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Samsung Telecommunications America LLC merged into Defendant Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. as of January 1, 2015, and no longer exists as a separate entity. Dkt. No. 69.
-1-

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 3:14-CV-05298-JST

1
2

Dated:

December 19, 2016

Dated:

December 19, 2016

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

By: /s/ Kalpana Srinivasan
Kalpana Srinivasan

By: /s/ David Almeling
David Almeling

KALPANA SRINIVASAN (S.B. #237460)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, California 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-789-3150
[e-mail]

MICHAEL K. PLIMACK (S.B. #133869)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINE S. HASKETT (S.B. #188053)
[e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Ph: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

BARRY BARNETT (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
901 Main Street, Suite 5100
Dallas, Texas 75202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214-754-1933
[e-mail]
MAX L. TRIBBLE, JR. (Pro Hac Vice)
JOSEPH S. GRINSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 713-654-6666
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
PATRICK C. BAGEANT (Pro Hac Vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206-516-3883
[e-mail]

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
[e-mail]
DAVID S. ALMELING (S.B. #235449)
[e-mail]
MARK LIANG (S.B. #278487)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
MISHIMA ALAM (S.B. #271621)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
1625 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
AMERICAN NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, INC.

24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 3:14-CV-05298-JST

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from each of its signatories.

4
5

Dated: December 19, 2016

By: /s/ David Almeling
David Almeling

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 3:14-CV-05298-JST

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Having considered the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of all claims and counterclaims
asserted between Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant American Navigation Systems, Inc.
(“AmNav”) and Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung”) in this case, the Court GRANTS
the motion in its entirety.
All claims of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,902,347 that AmNav raised or could
have raised are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. All claims, defenses, or counterclaims that
Samsung raised are dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that all
attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them.

12
13
14
15

Dated: December 20 2016
,
THE HONORABLE JON. S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 3:14-CV-05298-JST