Hernandez v. San Mateo County Community College District (Canada College)

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR JOINT INSPECTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

PAUL L. REIN, ESQ. (State Bar No. 43053)
CELIA MCGUINNESS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 159420)
CATHERINE CABALO, ESQ. (State Bar No. 248198)
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GERARDO HERNANDEZ
JOHN C. BEIERS, COUNTY COUNSEL (State Bar No. 144282)
KATHRYN E. MEOLA, ESQ. (State Bar No. 172034)
KRISTINA M. PASZEK, ESQ. (State Bar No. 226351)
Hall of Justice and Records
400 County Center, 6th Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

GERARDO HERNANDEZ,
Case No. C14-05317 RS

19

Plaintiff,
Civil Rights

20
21
22
23

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE
FOR JOINT INSPECTION

v.
SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNIDTY
COLLEGE DISTRICT (CANADA
COLLEGE); DOES 1-10, inclusive,

24

Action Filed: December 4, 2014

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
Case No. C14-5317 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR JOINT INSPECTION

1
2
3
4
5
6

STIPULATION
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES
AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
WHEREAS, this case has been assigned for early disclosures and mediation under General
Order 56;
WHEREAS, the deadline for the parties to hold a joint inspection of premises under

7

General Order 56 and the Court’s Scheduling Order of December 8, 2014 (hereinafter the

8

“Scheduling Order”), is March 19, 2015,

9

WHEREAS, the parties have attempted to schedule a timely joint inspection but have been

10

unable to find dates prior to March 19, 2015, when the parties, their counsel, and their consultants

11

are all available;

12
13
14
15

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among plaintiff and defendant to continue the
deadline for the joint inspection of premises until May 22, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 11, 2015

16

______________/s/________________
By: CATHERINE CABALO, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GERARDO HERNANDEZ

17
18
19

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

Dated: March 11, 2015

JOHN C. BEIERS, COUNTY COUNSEL

20
21
22
23

____________/s/___________________
By: KRISTINA M. PASZEK, DEPUTY
Attorneys for Defendant
SAN MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
DISTRICT

24
25
26

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order 45, section X(B), I hereby attest that on March 11, 2015, I,

27

Kristina Paszek, Deputy County Counsel, San Mateo County Counsel’s Office, received the

28

concurrence of Catherine Cabalo, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff, in the filing of this document.
Case No. C14-5317 RS
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR JOINT INSPECTION

1
2

ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby

3

ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to conduct the joint inspection under General Order 56

4

and the Court’s Scheduling Order of December 8, 2014 is HEREBY CONTINUED from

5

March 19, 2015 to May 22, 2015.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: ____________
3/12/15

9

__________________________________
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C14-5317 RS

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR JOINT INSPECTION