DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 104

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 103 Stipulation to Extend Time for DSS Technology Management, Inc. to Respond to Apple, Inc.'s 99 Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CHRISTOPHER M. JOE Texas State Bar No. 00787770 Chris.Joe@BJCIPLaw.com ERIC W. BUETHER Texas State Bar No. 03316880 Eric.Buether@BJCIPLaw.com BRIAN A. CARPENTER Texas State Bar No. 03840600 Brian.Carpenter@BJCIPLaw.com MARK D. PERANTIE Texas State Bar No. 24053647 Mark.Perantie@BJCIPLaw.com BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 1700 Pacific Avenue Suite 4750 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 466-1272 Facsimile: (214) 635-1828 10 11 12 13 14 15 MARC A. FENSTER State Bar No. 181067 mfenster@raklaw.com ADAM S. HOFFMAN State Bar No. 218740 ahoffman@raklaw.com RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 Telephone: (310) 826-7474 Facsimile: (310) 826-6991 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC., 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, vs. APPLE, INC., CASE NUMBER: 3:14-CV-05330-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, INC. TO RESPOND TO APPLE, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY CASE PENDING COMPLETION OF IPR PROCEEDINGS Defendant. 25 26 Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. (“DSS”) and Defendant Apple, Inc. 27 (“Apple”) hereby submit this stipulation to extend the time for DSS to respond to Apple’s 28 Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings to Monday, March 30, 2015 and to -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. C 14-05330 HSG 1 extend the time for Apple to file its reply in support of its Motion to Stay Case Pending 2 Completion of IPR Proceedings to Friday, April 10, 2015. 3 WHEREAS, DSS and Apple have agreed to extend the time for DSS to file its response 4 to Apple’s Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings to Monday, March 30, 5 2015 and have also agreed to extend the time for Apple to file its reply in support of its Motion 6 to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings to Friday, April 10, 2015, 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between DSS and Apple that the date for DSS to 8 file its response to Apple’s Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings, 9 currently March 27, 2015, will be continued to March 30, 2015. 10 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between DSS and Apple that the date for Apple 11 to file its reply in support of its Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings 12 will be extended to April 10, 2015. 13 DATED: March 27, 2015 14 BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 15 By: 16 17 18 /s/ Christopher M. Joe Christopher M. Joe Eric W. Buether Brian A. Carpenter Mark D. Perantie Marc A. Fenster Adam S. Hoffman 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. 20 21 22 23 24 ATTESTATION I hereby attest that all other signatories listed concur in the content and have authorized this filing. 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. C 14-05330 HSG 1 2 ORDER 3 Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DSS Technology 4 Management, Inc.’s response to Apple, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Case Pending Completion of IPR 5 Proceedings is due on Monday, March 30, 2015. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Apple, Inc.’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Stay 7 Case Pending Completion of IPR Proceedings is due on Friday, April 10, 2015. The Court will 8 not grant any further extensions of time in relation to the Motion to Stay briefing schedule. 9 10 Date: 3/30/2015 By: HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND – CASE NO. C 14-05330 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?