DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 116

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 114 Stipulation selecting Private ADR (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DSS Technology Management, Inc.,

CASE NO. C-14-05330-HSG

Plaintiff,
v.
Apple, Inc.,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant.
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
ý
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Private Mediation
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
ý

other requested deadline After the Court’s Claim Construction Order is issued.

Dated: 4/13/2015

/s/ Chris Joe
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: 4/13/2015

/s/ Jeremiah A. Armstrong
Attorney for Defendant

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5.1, I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this
document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” signature
(/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for
subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. I hereby attest
that all other signatories listed concur in the content and have authorized this filing.
Dated: 4/13/2015

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

/s/ Jeremiah A. Armstrong
Attorney for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties shall conduct private mediation by July 17, 2015. If the Court does not issue a
claim construction order by June 19, 2015, the Court will reset the mediation deadline.

Dated: 4/14/2015

__________________________________
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2