Miranda et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 25 Stipulation BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015)
1
7
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JOHN W. KEKER - #49092
jkeker@kvn.com
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - #243780
alauridsen@kvn.com
THOMAS E. GORMAN - #279409
tgorman@kvn.com
DAVID J. ROSEN - #296139
drosen@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
(415) 391-5400
Facsimile:
(415) 397-7188
8
Attorneys for Defendants
9
ALAN M. RIFKIN (pro hac vice)
M. CELESTE BRUCE (pro hac vice)
RIFKIN, WEINER, LIVINGSTON,
LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC
7979 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20814
Telephone:
(301) 951-0150
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
1
SAMUEL KORNHAUSER - #83528
LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL KORNHAUSER
155 Jackson Street, Suite 1807
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 981-6281
Facsimile:
(415) 981-7616
BRIAN DAVID, Illinois ARDC No. 0582468
LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN DAVID
33 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60610
Telephone:
(847) 778-7528
Facsimile:
(312) 346-8469
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Attorneys for Defendants
Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and
Baltimore Orioles, Inc.
15
DAVID M. GIVEN - #142375
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN
& CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
Telephone:
(415) 398-0900
Facsimile:
(415) 398-0911
Email: dmg@phillaw.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
SERGIO MIRANDA, et al.,
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE
LIMITS
21
22
23
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
BASEBALL, an unincorporated association
doing business as MAJOR LEAGUE
BASEBALL, et al.,
Judge:
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Date Filed: December 5, 2014
24
Defendants.
Trial Date: None set
25
26
27
28
1
With the exception of Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and Baltimore Orioles, Inc.,
Keker & Van Nest is counsel to all Defendants in this matter.
30
31
918992
32
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
1
2
Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the “Parties”), through their respective
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS, the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, Allan Huber “Bud” Selig and
4
twenty-nine Major League Baseball Clubs are represented by Keker & Van Nest LLP (“Keker-
5
Represented Defendants”), while the Baltimore Orioles, Inc. and Baltimore Orioles, L.P. are
6
represented by Rifkin, Weiner, Livingston, Levitan & Silver, LLC (“Orioles Defendants”);
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Stipulation re Service and Extension of Time to Respond to
8
Complaint filed on March 3, 2015, Defendants’ responses to Plaintiffs’ Complaint are due on
9
May 14, 2015;
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint by filing motions to
dismiss;
WHEREAS, the parties agree that it would be more efficient to file consolidated briefs
where it is practical to do so;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the Parties that the following
schedule be set:
1. The Keker-Represented Defendants will file a consolidated, joint brief of no more
than 25 total pages in support of their motions to dismiss;
2. The Orioles Defendants will file a consolidated, joint brief in support of their
motions to dismiss;
3. The Plaintiffs will file a consolidated, joint opposition brief of no more than 25
21
total pages in response to the Keker-Represented Defendants’ motions to dismiss
22
not more than 42 days after the Keker-Represented Defendants file their motions;
23
4. The Plaintiffs will file a consolidated, joint opposition brief in response to the
24
Orioles Defendants not more than 42 days after the Orioles Defendants file their
25
motions;
26
5. The Keker-Represented Defendants will file a consolidated, joint reply brief of no
27
more than 15 total pages in support of their motions to dismiss not more than 21
28
days after Plaintiffs file their opposition brief;
30
1
31
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
918992
32
1
6. The Orioles Defendants will file a consolidated, joint reply brief in support of their
2
motions to dismiss not more than 21 days after Plaintiffs file their opposition brief;
3
4
5
7. The Parties will confer regarding a mutually agreeable hearing date prior to the
filing of Defendants’ motions to dismiss.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
Dated: March 4, 2015
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
8
By:
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
12
13
/s/ John W. Keker
JOHN W. KEKER
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN
THOMAS E. GORMAN
DAVID J. ROSEN
Dated: March 4, 2015
RIFKIN, WEINER, LIVINGSTON,
LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC
14
15
By:
16
17
/s/ M. Celeste Bruce
M. CELESTE BRUCE
Attorneys for Defendants
Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and
Baltimore Orioles, Inc.
18
19
Dated: March 4, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL
KORNHAUSER
20
21
22
By:
23
/s/ Samuel Kornhauser
SAMUEL KORNHAUSER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
24
25
26
27
28
30
2
31
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
918992
32
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: March 10, 2015
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Judge of the Northern District of California
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
3
31
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
918992
32
1
CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM OTHER PARTIES
2
I, Thomas E. Gorman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE
4
LIMITS. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each of the
5
signatories has concurred in the filing of this document and has authorized the use of his or her
6
electronic signature.
7
8
/s/ Thomas E. Gorman
THOMAS E. GORMAN
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
4
31
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
918992
32
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?