Miranda et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball et al

Filing 49

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 48 Stipulation Re 41 MOTION to Dismiss (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2015)

1

7

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JOHN W. KEKER - # 49092
[e-mail]
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN - # 243780
[e-mail]
THOMAS E. GORMAN - # 279409
[e-mail]
DAVID J. ROSEN - # 296139
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188

8

Attorneys for Defendants

9

ALAN M. RIFKIN (pro hac vice)
M. CELESTE BRUCE (pro hac vice)
RIFKIN, WEINER, LIVINGSTON
LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC
7979 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 400
Bethesda, MD 20814
Telephone:
301 951 0150

2
3
4
5
6

10
11
12
13
14

1

SAMUEL KORNHAUSER - # 83528
LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL KORNHAUSER
155 Jackson Street, Suite 1807
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415 981 6281
Facsimile:
415 981 7616
BRIAN DAVID, Illinois ARDC No. 0582468
LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN DAVID
33 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60610
Telephone:
847 778 7528
Facsimile:
312 346 8469
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID M. GIVEN - # 142375
PHILLIPS, ERLEWINE, GIVEN, & CARLIN LLP
39 Mesa Street, Suite 201
The Presidio
San Francisco, CA 94129
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants
Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and
Baltimore Orioles, Inc.

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19

SERGIO MIRANDA, et al.,

20

Plaintiffs,

21
22
23

v.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
BASEBALL, an unincorporated association
doing business as MAJOR LEAGUE
BASEBALL, et al.,

24

Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
Judge:

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Date Filed: December 5, 2014
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.
25
26
27
28

1

With the exception of Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership and Baltimore Orioles, Inc., Keker
& Van Nest is counsel to all Defendants in this matter.

30
31
32

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG

1

Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7-2 and the Court’s standing order, the parties through

2

undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court set the hearing on

3

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for August 27, 2015 at 2:00 PM or as soon thereafter as counsel

4

may be heard. The parties declare in support of this request:

5
6

WHEREAS, no hearing date was set at the time the parties’ counsel stipulated to a
briefing schedule on this motion; and

7

WHEREAS, August 27, 2015 is the next available hearing date.

8

THEREFORE, pursuant to said stipulation, the parties through their respective attorneys

9
10
11
12

stipulate as follows:
The Court setting the hearing on Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss for August 27,
2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 15.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

13
14

Dated: July 13, 2015

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

15
16

By:

18

/s/ R. Adam Lauridsen
JOHN W. KEKER
R. ADAM LAURIDSEN
THOMAS E. GORMAN
DAVID J. ROSEN

19

Attorneys for Defendants

17

20
21

Dated: July 13, 2015

LAW OFFICES OF SAMUEL
KORNHAUSER

22
23

By:

/s/ Samuel Kornhauser
SAMUEL KORNHAUSER

24
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

25
26
27
28
30

1

31

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG

32

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

2
3

The Court, having considered the parties’ request for hearing and their stipulation and

4

GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that hearing on Defendants’ pending

5

motion to dismiss is set for August 27, 2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 15.

6
7
8
9

Dated:

7/15/2015

Judge, United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30

2

31

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG

32

1

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM OTHER PARTIES

2
I, Samuel Kornhauser, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

4
TO DISMISS. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each of the
5
signatories has concurred in the filing of this document and has authorized the use of his or her
6
electronic signature.
7
8

/s/ Samuel Kornhauser
SAMUEL KORNHAUSER

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30

3

31

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Case No. 3:14-CV-05349-HSG

32