Ultratech, Inc. v. Ensure Nanotech (Beijing) et al

Filing 42

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS AND VACATING HEARING by Hon. William Alsup re 27 Motion to Dismiss.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
No. C 14-05361 WHA

ULTRATECH, INC., d/b/a ULTRATECH /
CAMBRIDGE NANOTECH,

11
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
v.
13

15

ENSURE NANOTECH (BEIJING), INC.;
ENSURE NANOTECH LLC, d/b/a
ENSURE SCIENTIFIC GROUP LLC; and
DONGJUN WANG,

16

Defendants.

14

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION TO DISMISS AND
VACATING HEARING

/
17
18

On March 23, the parties filed a stipulation stating that if plaintiff filed a first amended

19

complaint, defendants’ motion to dismiss would be rendered moot. Now, plaintiff has filed a

20

first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 41). Accordingly, defendants’ motion is dismiss is hereby

21

DENIED AS MOOT. The April 30 hearing is hereby VACATED.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 27, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE