dpiX LLC v. Yieldboost Tech Inc et al
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by dpiX LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 2, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
STEPHANIE O. SPARKS – BAR NO. 218438
sos@hogefenton.com
SHELLA DEEN – BAR NO. 149735
sd@hogefenton.com
JUSTINE M. CANNON – BAR NO. 254176
jmc@hogefenton.com
HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.
Sixty South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
Phone: (408) 287-9501
Fax: (408) 287-2583
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DPIX LLC
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
DPIX LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
14
Plaintiff,
15
No. 3:14-CV-05382-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT
vs.
(Civil L.R. 6-2)
16
17
YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., a California
corporation, and KYO YOUNG CHUNG,
an individual,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Request to File Amended Complaint filed
herein on June 1, 2015, and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff DPIX LLC is granted leave to file its Amended
24
Complaint out of time, and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint filed on May 14, 2015 (Dkt. 39) shall be
25
deemed filed as of the date of this Order.
26
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of
this Order to file an Amended Answer and Counterclaims to the Amended Complaint.
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT
3:14-CV-05382-NC
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended
2
complaint either this Wednesday, June 3, 2015, or the day following the Court’s order granting
3
leave to file an amended complaint, following the parties’ efforts to meet and confer on Defendants’
4
objections, and if Plaintiff so files, then Defendants shall have a further fourteen (14) days thereafter
5
in which to file their answer and counterclaims thereto.
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation shall be without prejudice to, and
without a waiver of, Defendants’ right to challenge the adequacy of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 2, 2015
12
ERED
ORD
T IS SO
I
R NIA
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
S
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
HON. JON S. TIGAR
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT. OF gar
S Ti CALIFORNIA
RT
15
J u d ge J o
H
ER
n
16
17
FO
NO
14
LI
13
A
9
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT
3:14-CV-05382-NC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?