dpiX LLC v. Yieldboost Tech Inc et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by dpiX LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 2, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

STEPHANIE O. SPARKS – BAR NO. 218438
[e-mail]
SHELLA DEEN – BAR NO. 149735
[e-mail]
JUSTINE M. CANNON – BAR NO. 254176
[e-mail]
HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.
Sixty South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DPIX LLC

8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13

DPIX LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

14
Plaintiff,
15

No. 3:14-CV-05382-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT

vs.
(Civil L.R. 6-2)

16
17

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC., a California
corporation, and KYO YOUNG CHUNG,
an individual,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23

The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Request to File Amended Complaint filed
herein on June 1, 2015, and good cause appearing therefor:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff DPIX LLC is granted leave to file its Amended

24

Complaint out of time, and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint filed on May 14, 2015 (Dkt. 39) shall be

25

deemed filed as of the date of this Order.

26
27

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of
this Order to file an Amended Answer and Counterclaims to the Amended Complaint.

28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT

3:14-CV-05382-NC

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended

2

complaint either this Wednesday, June 3, 2015, or the day following the Court’s order granting

3

leave to file an amended complaint, following the parties’ efforts to meet and confer on Defendants’

4

objections, and if Plaintiff so files, then Defendants shall have a further fourteen (14) days thereafter

5

in which to file their answer and counterclaims thereto.

6
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation shall be without prejudice to, and
without a waiver of, Defendants’ right to challenge the adequacy of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

8
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 2, 2015
12

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

I

R NIA

UNIT
ED

11

RT
U
O

S

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

HON. JON S. TIGAR
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT. OF gar
S Ti CALIFORNIA

RT

15

J u d ge J o

H

ER

n

16
17

FO

NO

14

LI

13

A

9

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO FILE AM. COMPLAINT

3:14-CV-05382-NC