dpiX LLC v. Yieldboost Tech Inc et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by dpiX LLC Regarding ADR Process filed by dpiX LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DPIX LLC,
CASE NO. 14-CV-05382-JST
Plaintiff(s),
v.

FURTHER STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING ADR PROCESS

YIELDBOOST TECH, INC.,
and KYO YOUNG CHUNG
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached
the following further stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
☐
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate
in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice
of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☒
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Mediation with
private mediator to be determined.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of
the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
☒

other requested deadline 60 days from date of ADR Order.

Dated: September 3, 2015

/s/Stephanie O. Sparks
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: September 3, 2015

/s/Matthew Prebeg
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

S

DERED
SO OR
________________________
IT IS

Dated: September 4, 2015

R NIA

XX
☐
☐

UNITED STATES JUDGE

A

H

LI

RT

ER

S . Ti ga r

FO

NO

n
J u d ge J o

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

ATTESTATION
I, Stephanie O. Sparks, am the ECF user whose User ID and Password are being
used to file the FURTHER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
ADR PROCESS. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5.1(i)(3), I hereby attest that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory Matthew
Prebeg.
DATED: September 3, 2015
HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.

By /s/Stephanie O. Sparks
Stephanie O. Sparks
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DPIX LLC