Artifex Software, Inc. v. BigTinCan Holdings Pty. Ltd.

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Service of the First Amended Complaint and the Time for Filing Responsive Pleadings filed by Artifex Software, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/11/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DARIN SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
[e-mail]
DAVID SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)
[e-mail]
JESSE KOEHLER (S.B. #300530)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
SAN FRANCISCO

11
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.,

Case No. 5:14-cv-05415-EMC

12
Plaintiff,

13
v.

14
15

BIGTINCAN MOBILE PTY. LTD.; and BTC
MOBILITY LLC,

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE OF THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND THE
TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE
PLEADINGS

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff Artifex, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a First Amended Complaint naming BigTinCan
Mobile Pty. Ltd. and BTC Mobility LLC (“Defendants”) as defendants on January 20, 2015.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties, through their undersigned counsel of
record, that:
1.

Defendants have waived formal service of the First Amended Complaint, and

23

counsel for the Defendants has accepted service of the First Amended Complaint in

24

Massachusetts on behalf of both Defendants.

25
26
27
28

2.

Defendants will file an answer(s) or other response(s) to the First Amended

Complaint on or before March 27, 2015.
In signing and submitting this proposed stipulated order, Defendants do not intend to
waive and do not waive: (a) any defense or objection to the First Amended Complaint except for
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
5:14-cv-05415-EMC

1

the requirement that they be formally served pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, or any other applicable

2

rule or law; or (b) any objection to any exercise of jurisdiction over them by this Court.

3
4

DATED: March 6, 2015

5

Respectfully submitted,
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

6
By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.

11
12
13

_

DATED: March 6, 2015

Respectfully submitted,
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR, LLP

14

17

/s/ Nathan L. Walker
Nathan L. Walker
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR, LLP
950 Page Mill Road

18

Tel:

19

Attorneys for Defendants
BIGTINCAN MOBILE PTY. LTD. and BTC
MOBILITY LLC

15

By:

16

_

Palo Alto, CA 94304

20

[phone]; Fax: [phone]

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
5:14-cv-05415-EMC

1

ATTESTATION

2

I hereby attest that the other signatory listed concurs in this filing’s content and has

3
4

authorized the filing.
Dated: March 6, 2015.

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

5
6

By:

7

/s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
5:14-cv-05415-EMC

S

R NIA

FO

LI

ER

H

6

DERED

O OR
______________________________________
IT IS S
Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Court Judge
. Chen
dward M
Judge E

RT

5

, 2015

NO

4

11

7

A

3

Dated: March

UNIT
ED

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
5:14-cv-05415-EMC