Artifex Software, Inc. v. BigTinCan Holdings Pty. Ltd.
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation Regarding Continuance of July 23, 2015 Further Case Management Conference filed by Artifex Software, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 8/20/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2015 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/20/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527)
dsepanik@omm.com
JESSE J. KOEHLER (S.B. #300530)
jkoehler@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.
8
9
10
11
12
13
MARK D. FLANAGAN (S.B. #130303)
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
NATHAN L. WALKER (S.B. #206128)
nathan.walker@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR, LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 858-6000
Facsimile:
(650) 858-6100
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants
BIGTINCAN MOBILE PTY. LTD.
and BTC MOBILITY LLC
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN FRANCISCO
20
21
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
v.
BIGTINCAN MOBILE PTY. LTD.; and
BTC MOBILITY LLC,
Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-05415-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
CONTINUANCE OF JULY 23, 2015
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE:
CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05415-EMC
1
Plaintiff Artifex Software, Inc. and defendants BigTinCan Mobile Pty. Ltd. and BTC
2
Mobility LLC, through their respective counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the
3
Court, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
4
5
1.
The parties’ settlement discussions have continued since the June 11, 2014
mediation session.
6
2.
The parties have made significant progress toward settlement.
7
3.
The parties would like to obtain additional time to exhaust their settlement efforts
8
9
before the next Case Management Conference.
4.
Given the parties’ continuing desire and effort to reach a settlement, good cause
10
exists, and the parties respectfully ask the Court, to reset the Further Case Management
11
Conference—currently scheduled for July 23, 2015—for August 27, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. or for a
12
subsequent date more convenient for the Court.
13
SO STIPULATED.
14
Dated: July 17, 2015
15
16
DARIN W. SNYDER
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder
17
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTIFEX SOFTWARE, INC.
18
19
20
21
Dated: July 17, 2015
NATHAN L. WALKER
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR, LLP
22
23
24
25
By: /s/ Nathan L Walker
Nathan L. Walker
Attorneys for Defendants
BIGTINCAN MOBILE PTY. LTD.
and BTC MOBILITY LLC
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION RE:
CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05415-EMC
1
ATTESTATION
2
I hereby attest that the other signatory listed concurs in this filing’s content and has
3
4
authorized the filing.
Dated: July 17, 2015
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
5
6
By:
7
/s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION RE:
CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05415-EMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
IT IS ORDERED that the foregoing Stipulation is approved. The Further Case
3
Management Conference is reset for ________________, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5,
4
17th Floor, San Francisco.
S
R NIA
. Chen
J
ER
12
FO
ward M
udge Ed
H
11
RT
10
NO
9
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
LI
8
Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
A
7
Dated: ___________, 2015
S DISTRICT
TE
C
________________________________________________
TA
RT
U
O
6
7/20
UNIT
ED
5
August 27
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
JOINT STIPULATION RE:
CMC AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05415-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?