Winston et al v. Department of Agriculture et al

Filing 31

THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/5/2015 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 10/21/2015. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/7/2015. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 LUCILLE WINSTON, et al., Case No. 14-cv-05417-MEJ Plaintiffs, 5 v. THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 6 7 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 On September 18, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, with a noticed hearing date United States District Court Northern District of California 11 of November 5, 2015. Dkt. No. 25. However, Plaintiffs failed to file an opposition pursuant to 12 Civil Local Rule 7. Further, on September 21, 2015, the Court directed the parties to consent or 13 decline magistrate judge jurisdiction by October 2, yet Plaintiffs failed to respond. Accordingly, 14 the Court hereby VACATES the motion hearing and ORDERS Plaintiffs Lucille Winston and 15 Lumari Newsome to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute 16 and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiffs shall file a declaration by October 21, 2015. 17 If a responsive declaration is filed, the Court shall either issue an order based on the declaration or 18 conduct a hearing on November 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden 19 Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Notice is hereby given to Plaintiffs that the Court may 20 dismiss this case without a hearing if no responsive declaration is filed. Thus, it is imperative that 21 the Court receive a written response by the deadline above. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 7, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?