Asmus v. Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC

Filing 39

ORDER granting Motions terminated: 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule filed by Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC, Akima, LLC. Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 6/1/2016. Responses due by 6/20/2016. Replies due by 6/29/2016. Motion Hearing reset for 7/8/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/14/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 PAUL ASMUS, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 3:14-CV-05418 CRB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE PEGASUS AVIATION SERVICES, LLC., an Alaskan Corporation, AKIMA, LLC, and DOES 1-20, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05418) [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION 1 2 Having considered the foregoing “Joint Stipulation to Extend The Dispositive Motion 3 Briefing Schedule” and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 4 as follows: 5 1. The deadlines for filing dispositive motions is continued from April 8, 2016 to 6 June 1, 2016; oppositions are continued from April 22, 2016 to June 20, 2016; 7 and replies are continued from April 29, 2016 to June 29, 2016. 8 2. The hearing on dispositive motions is continued from May 13, 2016 to 10:00 a.m. on July 8, 2016. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 Date: March 14, 2016 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 16 17 18 19 Firmwide:139246595.1 078507.1005 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05418) [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?