Asmus v. Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC
Filing
39
ORDER granting Motions terminated: 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Dispositive Motion Briefing Schedule filed by Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC, Akima, LLC. Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 6/1/2016. Responses due by 6/20/2016. Replies due by 6/29/2016. Motion Hearing reset for 7/8/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/14/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
PAUL ASMUS,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 3:14-CV-05418 CRB
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
PEGASUS AVIATION SERVICES, LLC.,
an Alaskan Corporation, AKIMA, LLC,
and DOES 1-20,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Treat Towers
1255 Treat Boulevard
Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.932.2468
(CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05418)
[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION
1
2
Having considered the foregoing “Joint Stipulation to Extend The Dispositive Motion
3
Briefing Schedule” and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
4
as follows:
5
1. The deadlines for filing dispositive motions is continued from April 8, 2016 to
6
June 1, 2016; oppositions are continued from April 22, 2016 to June 20, 2016;
7
and replies are continued from April 29, 2016 to June 29, 2016.
8
2. The hearing on dispositive motions is continued from May 13, 2016 to 10:00
a.m. on July 8, 2016.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
15
Date: March 14, 2016
THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
16
17
18
19
Firmwide:139246595.1 078507.1005
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Treat Towers
1255 Treat Boulevard
Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
925.932.2468
(CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05418)
[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?