EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filing 155

ORDERS GRANTING THE WITHDRAWAL OF EON'S MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS UNDER THE '101 PATENT AND GRANTING APPLE PERMISSION TO AMEND TO ASSERT COUNTERCLAIMS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/16/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EON CORP IP HOLDINGS LLC,

Case No. 14-cv-05511-WHO

Plaintiff,
8
v.

11

ORDERS GRANTING THE
WITHDRAWAL OF EON’S MOTION
TO DISMISS CLAIMS UNDER THE
‘101 PATENT AND GRANTING APPLE
PERMISSION TO AMEND TO ASSERT
COUNTERCLAIMS

12

Re: Dkt. Nos. 150, 153

9
10

APPLE INC.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.

For the reasons discussed at the last two Case Management Conferences and with good

13
14

cause appearing, Eon is allowed to withdraw its motion to dismiss so that it can litigate the ‘101

15

and ‘491 patents together. At Eon’s request, its claims under the ‘546 patent are dismissed with

16

prejudice.

17

The parties have proposed that Apple’s claims in 3:15-CV-03762-WHO be converted into

18

counterclaims in this case. It is so ordered. Apple will voluntarily dismiss that action after it files

19

an amended pleading in this case that asserts the converted counterclaims.
This Order supersedes any ambiguous or contrary statement in the minutes at Dkt. No.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

153.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 16, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge