EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Filing 227

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/25/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

David J. Miclean (SBN 115098)
Carmen M. Aviles (SBN 251993)
Miclean Gleason LLP
411 Borel Avenue, Suite 310
San Mateo, CA 94402
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Daniel R. Scardino (pro hac vice)
Joshua Jones (pro hac vice)
REED & SCARDINO LLP
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

17

Plaintiff,

18

vs.

19

APPLE INC.,

20
21
22
23
24

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-cv-05511-WHO
Assigned to: Hon. William H. Orrick
STIPULATION AND ORDER
OF DISMISSAL

On this day, Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON”) and Defendant Apple Inc.
(“Apple”), have agreed to dismiss all claims and counterclaims between the parties.
Accordingly, EON and Apple hereby stipulate to dismissal pursuant to the below Order.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05511-WHO

1
2
3
4
5
6

Dated: April 24, 2017

REED & SCARDINO LLP
By: /s/ Daniel R. Scardino
Daniel R. Scardino
[e-mail]
Joshua G. Jones
[e-mail]
301 Congress Ave Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701

7

MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

8

David J. Miclean, SBN 115098
[e-mail]
Carmen M. Aviles, SBN 251993
[e-mail]

9
10
11

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

By: /s/ Irene Yang (with permission)
Michael J. Bettinger, SBN 122196
[e-mail]
Irene Yang, SBN 245464
[e-mail]
Ezekiel L. Rauscher, SBN 269141
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Ash Nagdev, SBN 259921
[e-mail]
Ryuk Park, SBN 298744
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304

19
20
21
22

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
APPLE INC.

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ORDER
On this day, Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON”) and Defendant Apple Inc.
(“Apple”) announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted
in this cause. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for
dismissal should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against Apple by EON
herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all counterclaims for relief against EON by Apple are
dismissed, with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be
borne by each party incurring the same.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 25, 2017
Dated: ____________________

15
16
17
18

THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Court Judge
FILER’S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.

19
20
21
22
23

Dated: April 24, 2017

REED & SCARDINO LLP
By: /s/ Daniel R. Scardino
Daniel R. Scardino
[e-mail]

24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL