Miyakawa v. Adobe Systems Incorporated

Filing 24

SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/11/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 4/4/2016 - 4/14/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 15, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

MARIKO MIYAKAWA,

Case No. 14-cv-05518-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

1/30/15

Mediation deadline

6/5/15

20

Fact discovery cut-off

10/2/15

21

Expert disclosures

10/23/15

22

Expert rebuttal

11/13/15

Expert discovery cut-off

12/4/15

Deadline to file dispositive motions

12/18/15

Pretrial conference statement due

3/1/15

Pretrial conference

3/11/16 at 2:00 p.m.

Trial

4/4/16 at 8:30 a.m.

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

Event

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

Deadline

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Eight

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
to grant a continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
Dated: April 15, 2015
16
17
18

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2