Wroth v. County of Sonoma et al

Filing 61

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 2/22/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

John H. Scott, SBN 72578
Lizabeth N. de Vries, SBN 227215
SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Izaak D. Schwaiger, SBN 267888
527 Mendocino Avenue Ste. B
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
Tel. [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

9
10

Attorneys for the Plaintiff
ESA WROTH

11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

Plaintiff,

17
18

Case No. CV-14-05519 SI

ESA WROTH,

v.

21

COUNTY OF SONOMA, STEVE FREITAS,
BRIAN GALLOWAY, SCOTT RIVERS,
EDUARDO ESPINO, FRANCISCO
FLORES, MICHAEL SKINNER, and DOES
1-25, inclusive.

22

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants.

19
20

23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1
2
3

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Settlement Agreement
and Mutual Release executed by and between the parties identified herein, the undersigned,
counsel of record for plaintiff ESA WROTH, and defendants COUNTY OF SONOMA, STEVE

4
FREITAS, BRIAN GALLOWAY, SCOTT RIVERS, EDUARDO ESPINO, FRANCISCO
5
6

FLORES, and MICHAEL SKINNER, respectively, do hereby agree and stipulate that the above-

7

captioned case be dismissed, in its entirety and with prejudice, as to all defendants. Each party

8

shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

9

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

10
11

Dated: February 1, 2016

12

Respectfully submitted,
SCOTT LAW FIRM

13
14

By: /s/John Houston Scott________________
John Houston Scott
Attorney for Plaintiff ESA WROTH

15
16
17
18

DATED: February 1, 2016

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

19
20
21
22
23
24

By: /s/Richard W. Osman_________________
Richard W. Osman
Attorney for Defendants COUNTY OF
SONOMA, STEVE FREITAS, BRIAN
GALLOWAY, SCOTT RIVERS, EDUARDO
ESPINO, FRANCISCO FLORES and
MICHAEL SKINNER

25
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the parties’ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL set forth above, the Court

3

hereby orders that:

4
5

1. The above-captioned case be dismissed, in its entirety and with prejudice.

6

2. Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

7
8
9
10

2/2/16
Dated:________________________

_________________________________
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE