Wong v. Anderson et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer regarding 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction NOTICE OF MOTION, MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF CITY� 39;S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 2/20/2015. Replies due by 2/27/2015. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

CHRISTINA WONG,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. 3:14-cv-05524-CRB
SCHEDULING ORDER RE MOTIONS
TO DISMISS

v.
ELLEN ANDERSON, ET AL.,
Defendants.

/

16
17

The Court is in receipt of pro se Plaintiff Christina Wong’s motion (dkt. 26) for an

18

extension of time to respond to the motions to dismiss filed by defendants San Francisco

19

Housing Development Corporation (“SFHDC”) (dkt. 11) and Borrower’s Best (dkt. 14).

20

The deadline to respond to SFHDC’s and Borrower’s Best’s motions passed on February 4

21

and February 6, respectively, without any filing from Wong. Also pending is a joint motion

22

to dismiss by defendants Ellen Anderson and Linda Harrison (dkt. 7), to which Wong did not

23

respond, and a motion to dismiss by defendant City and County of San Francisco (dkt. 16), to

24

which a response is due February 13.

25

The Court hereby vacates the February 27, 2015 hearing on the motions to dismiss

26

filed by SFHDC, Borrower’s Best, Anderson, and Harrison. Those hearings are rescheduled

27

and consolidated with the March 6, 2015, 10:00 a.m., hearing on the motion to dismiss filed

28

by the City and County of San Francisco. Wong may file any written oppositions to all

1

pending motions by February 20, 2015. Defendants should file any replies by February 27,

2

2015. The Court puts all parties on notice that it might take the matter under submission

3

without a hearing pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-1(b), so written

4

filings should contain all arguments the parties wish to make in defense or opposition to the

5

motions to dismiss.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: February 10, 2015
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2