Doverspike v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
8
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 7 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTT{ERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CTIASE
DOYERSPIKE
,
CASE NO. 3;14-Cv-0557s VC
Plaintif(s),
STIPULATTON AND IPROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
STATE F
MUTUAL
Defendant(s).
following
The parties
report that thoy have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
to participate in the following ADR prooess:
Court
n
X
!
Nute: Parties
appreciably
ADR phone
ADRPhone C
Priva
n
The parties
n
on-binding Arbihation (ADR L.R. 4)
yNeutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
iation (ADR L.R. 6)
ha believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
lihely to meet their needs than arry other form of ADR must participate in an
nce and may not file this farm. They must insteadfile a Notice af Needfor
See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADRL.R. 3-S)
Process:
vate ADR (please identify process and provider)
to hold the ADR session bv:
presumptivs dsadline Qhe deadline is 90 daysfrom the date of the order
rring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
n
Dated:March
Attorney for Plaintiff
2015
P. Ellingson
CONTINTIE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
IPROPOSEDI ORDER
!
XX
n
The parties' stipulation is adopted and tT IS SO ORDERED
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
J u d ge V
JUDGE
A
H
ER
STATES hhabria
ince C
FO
NO
UNTTED
R NIA
DERED
SO OR
IT IS
IFIED
S MOD
A
LI
March 5, 2015
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
The deadline to complete ENE is 90 days from today's date.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.9., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.',
ta.ge z or 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?