Crawford v. Beard
Filing
103
ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 99 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 100 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JAMES DARREN CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 14-cv-05578-JD
ORDER
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 100
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (Docket No. 99) is granted. Plaintiff may file
13
objections to the magistrate judge’s May 17, 2016, order of service by November 23, 2020.
14
Plaintiff’s request to file a third amended complaint is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff should
15
file objections to the magistrate judge’s order of service and present his arguments as described in
16
the Court’s prior order.
17
Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel. The Ninth Circuit has held that a
18
district court may ask counsel to represent an indigent litigant only in “exceptional
19
circumstances,” the determination of which requires an evaluation of both (1) the likelihood of
20
success on the merits, and (2) the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of
21
the complexity of the legal issues involved. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.
22
1991). Plaintiff appears able to present his claims adequately, and the issues are not complex, and
23
so the request (Docket No. 100) is denied.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 4, 2020
26
27
28
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?