Reyes v. Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension Fund
Filing
63
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION re 62 Proposed Order, filed by Carmelo Calabro, Smail Musovic, Antonio Merolla, Salvatore Tagliareni, John Williams, Almond Reid, Russell Neubert, Juan M. Reyes, Tesfaye Ghebremedhin, Philip Rogers, Angel De La Cruz. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 8, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
EMILY P. RICH, Bar No. 168735
CONCEPCIÓN E. LOZANO-BATISTA, Bar No. 227227
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
Telephone (510) 337-1001
Fax (510) 337-1023
E-Mail: erich@unioncounsel.net
clozano@unioncounsel.net
6
7
8
9
10
JULIA PENNY CLARK (admitted pro hac vice)
ROBERT ALEXANDER (admitted pro hac vice)
BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC
805 Fifteenth St. N.W. Tenth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone (202) 842 2600
Fax (202) 842 1888
E-Mail: jpclark@bredhoff.com
ralexander@bredhoff.com
11
Attorneys for Defendants
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
JUAN M. REYES, SALVATORE
TAGLIARENI, ANGEL DE LA CRUZ,
ANTONIO MEROLLA, SMAIL MUSOVIC,
TESFAYE GHEBREMEDHIN, PHILIP
ROGERS, ALMOND REID, CARMELO
CALABRO, RUSSELL NEUBERT, and
JOHN WILLIAMS, individually and as
representatives on behalf of a class of similarly
situated persons,
Case No. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
FOR STANDARD LITIGATION
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION
AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL
PENSION FUND; and STEVEN BERTELLI,
DAVID B. DURKEE, JETHRO A. HEAD,
ART MONTMINY, ROBERT OAKLEY,
JAMES RIVERS, RANDY D. ROARK,
BARBARA BRASIER, TRAVIS CLEMENS,
JON MCPHERSON, LOU MINELLA, DOUG
RUYGROK, and JOHN WAGNER, in their
official capacities as Trustees,
Defendants.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure
and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly,
the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective
Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all
disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and
use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under
the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below,
that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under
seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that
will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.
2.
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or
items under this Order.
2.2
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is
generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 26(c).
2.3
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well
as their support staff).
2.4
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it
produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.5
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things,
testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or
responses to discovery in this matter.
2.6
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a
consultant in this action.
3
4
2.7
Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
5
6
2.8
9
2.9
on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.
2.10
2.11
16
2.12
storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.
2.13
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
19
20
Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services
(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing,
17
18
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery
Material in this action.
14
15
Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
12
13
Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this
action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action
10
11
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party to this action.
7
8
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House
2.14
Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a
Producing Party.
3.
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material
(as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all
copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,
conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following
information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of
publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record
through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the
disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the
information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of
Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.
4.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this
Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and
defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion
and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the
time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or
Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to
limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The
Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or
oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents,
items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within
the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown
to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily
encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens
on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for
protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order
(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,
Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so
designated before the material is disclosed or produced.
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but
excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party
affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion
or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly
identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not
designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would
like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made
available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has
identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which
documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the
specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page
that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for
protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making
appropriate markings in the margins).
(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the
Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other
proceeding, all protected testimony.
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other
tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or
containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent
practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to
designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s
right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a
designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated
in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of
confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality
designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic
burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to
challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the
original designation is disclosed.
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process
by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each
challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must
recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph
of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must
begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication
are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging
Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and
must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the
circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen
designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it
has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is
unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
6.3
intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Civil
Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days of the
initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process
will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be accompanied by a
competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer
requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a
motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall
automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the
Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is
good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any
portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a
competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer
requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions.
Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a motion
to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in
question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until
the court rules on the challenge.
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or
produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has
been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DISPOSITION).
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a
secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered
by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any
information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees
of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information
for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is
attached hereto as Exhibit A;
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving
Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement
to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(d) the court and its personnel;
(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have
signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably
necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A),
unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed
deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately
bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this
Stipulated Protective Order.
(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
8.
3
LITIGATION
4
5
6
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels
disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party
must:
7
8
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a
copy of the subpoena or court order;
9
10
11
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the
other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this
Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
12
13
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the
Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena
or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL”
before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has
obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and
expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these
provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to
disobey a lawful directive from another court.
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
LITIGATION
(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in
this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in
connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.
Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional
protections.
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a NonParty’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the
Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:
4
5
(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or
all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
6
7
8
(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order
in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the
information requested; and
9
(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14
days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the
Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely
seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or
control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by
the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of
seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.
10.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order,
the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the
unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected
Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the
terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED
MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision
is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that
provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d)
and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or
information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may
incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted to the court.
12.
9
10
12.1
13
14
15
12.2
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order
no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any
information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no
Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by
this Protective Order.
16
17
Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to
seek its modification by the court in the future.
11
12
MISCELLANEOUS
12.3
Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or
a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the
public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed
under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at
issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing
that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled
to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the
information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by
the court.
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each
Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material.
As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations,
summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether
the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written
certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party)
by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material
that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies,
abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the
Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy
of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda,
correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant
and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival
copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set
forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
3
Dated: July ___, 2015
ABBEY SPANIER, LLP
FRUMKIN & HUNTER LLP
LAW OFFICE OF GEOFFREY V. WHITE
SINCLAIRWILLIAMS LLC
4
5
By:
6
7
8
9
/s/ William D. Frumkin
WILLIAM D. FRUMKIN (admitted pro hac vice)
ELIZABETH E. HUNTER (admitted pro hac vice)
THOMAS O. SINCLAIR (admitted pro hac vice)
JUDITH L. SPANIER (admitted pro hac vice)
GEOFFREY V. WHITE
M. CLAYBORN WILLIAMS (admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10
11
BREDHOFF & KAISER, PLLC
WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD
Dated: July 2, 2015
12
By:
13
14
/s/ Robert Alexander
ROBERT ALEXANDER (admitted pro hac vice)
JULIA PENNY CLARK (admitted pro hac vice)
CONCEPCIÓN E. LOZANO-BATISTA
EMILY P. RICH
Attorneys for Defendants
15
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
DATED: __July 8, 2015________________
_____________________________________
United States District/Magistrate Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEINBERG, ROGER &
ROSENFELD
A Professional Corporation
1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200
Alameda, California 94501
(510) 337-1001
30
31
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-5596 (JST)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or
type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the
Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California on [date] in the case of ___________ [insert formal name of the case and the
number and initials assigned to it by the court]. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the
terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply
could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I
will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective
Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even
if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of
_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as
my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related
to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.
20
21
22
Date: ______________________________________
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
23
24
Printed name: _______________________________
25
26
27
28
Signature: __________________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?