Olsen et al v. United States

Filing 16

Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant United States of America to Respond to the Complaint and to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference. The deadline for Defendant United States of America to Respond to the complaint sha ll be extended until and including 4/15/2015. Case Management Statement due by 4/24/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/1/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/9/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348) Chief, Civil Division MARK R. CONRAD (CABN 255667) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7025 Fax: (415) 436-6748 mark.conrad@usdoj.gov 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant Clayeo C. Arnold (SBN 65070) Anthony M. Ontiveros (SBN 152758) Kiersta D. Perlee (SBN 187675) CLAYEO C. ARNOLD A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 865 Howe Avenue Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 924-3100 Fax: (916) 924-1829 Email: aontiveros@justice4you.com Email: kperlee@justice4you.com 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 21 SAMARN OLSEN and NEOLANI OLSEN-RODRIGUEZ, 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 26 27 28 STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE Case No. C 14-05601 SI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. C 14-05601 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Samarn Olsen and Neolani Olsen-Rodriguez filed the above-captioned 2 action on December 23, 2014, see Dkt. Nos. 1 & 2; 3 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have served a copy of the Complaint for Wrongful Death on the 4 Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern 5 District of California in San Francisco, California; 6 WHEREAS, Defendant United States of America, which is specially appearing in connection 7 with the matters addressed by this stipulation, asserts that service upon the United States has not been 8 completed as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i); 9 WHEREAS, undersigned counsel for Defendant United States of America has a scheduling 10 conflict with the Initial Case Management Conference that was automatically set by the Court in this 11 matter for March 27, 2015; 12 WHEREAS, to avoid litigation over the adequacy of service upon the United States, and to 13 accommodate the schedules of undersigned counsel for Defendant United States of America; 14 NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their undersigned counsel in this action, the parties hereby 15 stipulate and agree as follows: 16 The deadline for Defendant United States of America to respond to the Complaint shall be 17 extended until and including April 15, 2015. The Initial Case Management Conference set in this matter 18 shall be continued until Friday, May 1, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. Pursuant to the Standing Order for All Judges 19 of the Northern District of California dated August 25, 2014, the parties shall file a Joint Case 20 Management Statement not later than Friday, April 24, 2015. 21 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 DATED: March 5, 2015 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 24 25 /s/ Mark R. Conrad MARK R. CONRAD Assistant United States Attorney 26 27 28 STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE Case No. C 14-05601 SI -1- 1 DATED: March 5, 2015 2 CLAYEO C. ARNOLD A Professional Law Corporation 3 /s/ Anthony M. Ontiveros ANTHONY M. ONTIVEROS Attorney for Plaintiffs 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Date: ________________________ 3/9/2015 9 _________________________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE Case No. C 14-05601 SI -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?