Olsen et al v. United States
Filing
16
Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant United States of America to Respond to the Complaint and to Continue the Initial Case Management Conference. The deadline for Defendant United States of America to Respond to the complaint sha ll be extended until and including 4/15/2015. Case Management Statement due by 4/24/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/1/2015 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/9/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE (CABN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
MARK R. CONRAD (CABN 255667)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: (415) 436-7025
Fax: (415) 436-6748
mark.conrad@usdoj.gov
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Defendant
Clayeo C. Arnold (SBN 65070)
Anthony M. Ontiveros (SBN 152758)
Kiersta D. Perlee (SBN 187675)
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: (916) 924-3100
Fax: (916) 924-1829
Email: aontiveros@justice4you.com
Email: kperlee@justice4you.com
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
21
SAMARN OLSEN and
NEOLANI OLSEN-RODRIGUEZ,
22
23
24
25
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
26
27
28
STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE
Case No. C 14-05601 SI
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. C 14-05601 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Samarn Olsen and Neolani Olsen-Rodriguez filed the above-captioned
2 action on December 23, 2014, see Dkt. Nos. 1 & 2;
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have served a copy of the Complaint for Wrongful Death on the
4 Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern
5 District of California in San Francisco, California;
6
WHEREAS, Defendant United States of America, which is specially appearing in connection
7 with the matters addressed by this stipulation, asserts that service upon the United States has not been
8 completed as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i);
9
WHEREAS, undersigned counsel for Defendant United States of America has a scheduling
10 conflict with the Initial Case Management Conference that was automatically set by the Court in this
11 matter for March 27, 2015;
12
WHEREAS, to avoid litigation over the adequacy of service upon the United States, and to
13 accommodate the schedules of undersigned counsel for Defendant United States of America;
14
NOW, THEREFORE, by and through their undersigned counsel in this action, the parties hereby
15 stipulate and agree as follows:
16
The deadline for Defendant United States of America to respond to the Complaint shall be
17 extended until and including April 15, 2015. The Initial Case Management Conference set in this matter
18 shall be continued until Friday, May 1, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. Pursuant to the Standing Order for All Judges
19 of the Northern District of California dated August 25, 2014, the parties shall file a Joint Case
20 Management Statement not later than Friday, April 24, 2015.
21
22
Respectfully submitted,
23 DATED: March 5, 2015
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
24
25
/s/ Mark R. Conrad
MARK R. CONRAD
Assistant United States Attorney
26
27
28
STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE
Case No. C 14-05601 SI
-1-
1 DATED: March 5, 2015
2
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A Professional Law Corporation
3
/s/ Anthony M. Ontiveros
ANTHONY M. ONTIVEROS
Attorney for Plaintiffs
4
5
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Date: ________________________
3/9/2015
9
_________________________________________
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP TO CONT. CMC AND RESPONSE DEADLINE
Case No. C 14-05601 SI
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?