Philliben et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 21, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MATTHEW PHILLIBEN, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-05615-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER
9
10
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Re: ECF No. 32
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, ECF No. 32, the Court orders as follows:
13
The briefing schedule on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration,
14
ECF No. 25, for which a hearing is currently scheduled for May 21, 2015, is modified as follows:
15
Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration will be due
16
on May 13, 2015, and Defendants’ reply thereto will be due on May 26, 2015. The hearing on
17
Defendants’ motion will be rescheduled for June 11, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The case management
18
conference will be scheduled for July 22, 2015, at 2:00 p.m.; the case management statement will
19
be due on July 8, 2015, and the parties’ deadline to act under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26,
20
including the conference of the parties pursuant to Rule 26(f) and initial disclosures under Rule
21
26(a), will be extended accordingly and discovery shall remain stayed.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 21, 2015
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?