Philliben et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 63 JOINT STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES' SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED filed by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 14, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 [Counsel of Record Listed on Following Page] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 MATTHEW PHILLIBEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and BYRON McKNIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, vs. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Case No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST HON. JON S. TIGAR JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Mike Arias (CSB# 115385) mike@asstlawyers.com Alfredo Torrijos (CSB# 222458) alfredo@asstlawyers.com ARIAS SANGUINETTI STAHLE & TORRIJOS, LLP 6701 Center Drive West, 14th Floor Los Angeles, California 90045 Telephone: (310) 844-9696 Fax: (310) 861-0168 Steven D. Liddle (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) sliddle@mldclassaction.com Nicholas A. Coulson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) ncoulson@mldclassaction.com LIDDLE & DUBIN, P.C. 975 E. Jefferson Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48207 Telephone: (313) 392-0015 Fax: (313) 392-0025 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Matthew Philliben and Byron McKnight 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Andra Barmash Greene (CSB# 123931) agreene@irell.com A. Matthew Ashley (CSB# 198235) mashley@irell.com IRELL & MANELLA LLP 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 Newport Beach, California 92660 Tel: (949) 760-0991 Fax: (949) 760-5200 Attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT: 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Julian Mena, Todd Schreiber, Nate Coolidge and 3 Ernesto Mejia (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (“Defendants”) 4 (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) provide this update to inform the Court that they have reached 5 a settlement in principle in this case. The Parties are working on a Stipulation of Settlement with the 6 goal of filing it along with a motion for preliminary approval before the end of 2015. As a result, the 7 Parties respectfully request this Court to vacate Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending 8 Arbitration (Dkt. #25), currently scheduled to be heard on December 17, 2015. 9 10 By and through their respective counsel of record, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter an Order as follows: 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs commenced this action on December 23, 2014 [Dkt. #1]; 12 WHEREAS, on March 20, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending 13 Arbitration [Dkt. #25]; 14 WHEREAS, this Court granted the Parties’ Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Updating the 15 Court on Settlement Discussions and Requesting Extension of Temporary Stay on November 16, 2015 16 [Dkt. 61]; 17 18 19 20 21 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration is currently scheduled for December 17, 2015; WHEREAS, a Combined Case Management Conference is currently scheduled for January 25, 2016 [Dkt. # 62]; WHEREAS, the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this matter and are drafting a 22 Stipulation of Settlement, with the goal of filing said Stipulation along with a motion for preliminary 23 approval by the end of 2015; 24 WHEREAS, no scheduling order has been entered and no trial date has been set for this case and 25 the parties believe that the granting of the herein requested continuances will not have any effect on the 26 schedule for the case; 27 28 –2– JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 1 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties, by and through their 2 undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, agree and request that the Court enter an Order as follows: 3 1. That, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Stay 4 Proceedings Pending Arbitration [Dkt. #25] presently set for December 17, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. be 5 vacated; 6 2. That the Combined Case Management Conference presently set for January 25, 7 2016 at 1:30 p.m. [Dkt. #62], and the corresponding deadlines under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 8 and the Court’s orders, remain unchanged; and 9 3. That discovery remains stayed. 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: December 14, 2015 14 IRELL & MANELLA LLP By: 15 /s/ Andra B. Green Andra Barmash Greene A. Matthew Ashley 16 Counsel for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 17 18 19 Dated: December 14, 2015 ARIAS SANGUINETTI STAHLE & TORRIJOS, LLP 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Alfredo Torrijos Mike Arias Alfredo Torrijos LIDDLE & DUBIN, P.C. Steven D. Liddle Nicholas A. Coulson Counsel for Plaintiffs Matthew Philliben and Byron McKnight 27 28 –3– JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CERTIFICATION PER GENERAL ORDER NO. 45, § X-B Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, I, Nathaniel Lipanovich, hereby certify that on December 14, 2015, Alfredo Torrijos and Andra Greene authorized me to submit this Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Updating the Court on the Parties’ Settlement In Principle and Requesting That Arbitration Hearing Be Vacated. Dated: December 14, 2015 /s/ Nathaniel Lipanovich Nathaniel Lipanovich 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –4– JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST) 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the Parties’ December 14, 2015 Stipulation, the Court: 3 (1) 4 [Dkt. #25]; 5 (2) Vacates the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration Orders that the Combined Case Management Conference presently set for January 25, 6 2016 at 1:30 p.m. [Dkt. #62], and the corresponding deadlines under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 7 and the Court’s orders, remain unchanged; and _____________________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar Ti ga r United Statesdge JonCourt Judge District S. u J H ER LI RT 13 OO IT IS S NO 12 DATED: __________________ December 14, 2015 D RDERE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 A 11 UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 R NIA Orders that discovery shall remain stayed. S DISTRICT TE C TA FO (3) S 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –5– JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UPDATING THE COURT ON THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE AND REQUESTING THAT ARBITRATION HEARING BE VACATED (CASE NO. 3:14-CV-05615-JST)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?