Philliben et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 66

STIPULATION AND ORDER re (63 in 3:15-cv-00064-JST) JOINT STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES AND PERMITTING FILING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT) filed by Julian Mena; (65 in 3:14-cv-05615-JST) JOINT STIPULA TION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES AND PERMITTING FILING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Philliben, Byron McKnight. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 172098 rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com TINA WOLFSON, SBN 174806 twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com AHDOOT & WOLFSON, P.C. 1016 Palm Ave. West Hollywood, California 90069 Tel: 310-474-9111; Fax: 310-474-8585 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Julian Mena, Todd Schreiber, Nate Coolidge, and Ernesto Mejia 7 [Additional counsel appear on signature page] 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 MATTHEW PHILLIBEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and BYRON MCKNIGHT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 Case No. 4:14-cv-05615-JST Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 18 Defendants. 19 __________________________________________ 20 21 JULIAN MENA, TODD SCHREIBER, NATE COOLIDGE, and ERNESTO MEJIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 22 23 Plaintiffs, v. 24 25 26 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. Case No. 3:15-cv-00064-JST JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES AND PERMITTING FILING OF CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT Hon. Jon S. Tigar, Presiding 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST 1 This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Matthew Philliben, Julian Mena, Todd 2 Schreiber, Nate Coolidge, Ernesto Mejia, and Byron McKnight (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 3 defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) by and through their 4 respective counsel; 5 WHEREAS, the Philliben complaint was filed on December 23, 2014; 6 WHEREAS, the Mena complaint was filed on January 6, 2015; 7 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants has duly accepted service of the Summonses and 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Complaints; WHEREAS, on March 20, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration in Philliben; WHEREAS, on May 4, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration in Mena; WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Court in Philliben vacated the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration and ordered that discovery remain stayed; WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Court in Mena vacated the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration and ordered that discovery remain stayed; WHEREAS, counsel of the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this matter and are 18 drafting a Stipulation of Settlement, with the goal of filing said Stipulation along with a motion for 19 preliminary approval in January 2016; 20 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred, and the parties are in agreement that the 21 Mena action should be consolidated with the Philliben action for all purposes because the cases 22 involve similar complaints and common questions of law or fact, and because consolidation would 23 advance the interests of judicial economy; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties seek to agree upon a schedule for the filing of a consolidated complaint. 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for 1 2 Plaintiffs and Defendants, that: 1. 3 a. Matthew Philliben, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:14-cv- 4 05615-JST; and 5 b. Julian Mena, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:15-cv-00064-JST. 6 2. 7 8 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the above-captioned actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes into one action. 3. 9 10 The following actions are related cases within the meaning of Local Civil Rule 3-12(a): These actions shall be referred to herein as the “Consolidated Actions.” The Master Docket and Master File for the Consolidated Actions shall be Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-05615-JST. 4. 11 Every pleading in this Consolidated Action shall bear the following caption: 12 13 14 15 MATTHEW PHILLIBEN, JULIAN MENA, TODD SCHREIBER, NATE COOLIDGE, ERNESTO MEJIA, and BYRON McKnight, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No. 4:14-cv-05615-JST Honorable Jon S. Tigar, Presiding 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and RASIER, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 All orders, pleadings, motions and other documents shall, when filed and docketed in the Master file, 23 be deemed filed and docketed in each individual case to the extent applicable. 24 5. All subsequently-filed class or individual actions against the Defendants alleging the 25 same or similar claims as alleged in the complaints in these actions shall be consolidated under the 26 case Matthew Philliben, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:14-cv-05615-JST. 27 28 6. The Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Complaint within three (3) business days from the issueance of this Order. 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST 1 7. The deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleading to the Consolidated Complaint is 2 stayed pending the Court’s determination of the upcoming motion for preliminary approval of the 3 class settlement. 4 5 This Stipulation is without prejudice to any other rights that any party may have. DATED: December 31, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 6 AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC 7 By: /s/ Robert Ahdoot Robert Ahdoot rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com Tina Wolfson twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com 1016 Palm Avenue West Hollywood, California 90069 Tel: 310-474-9111 Fax: 310-474-8585 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Julian Mena, Todd Schreiber, Nate Coolidge, and Ernesto Mejia 13 14 15 ARIAS, SANGUINETTI, STAHLE & TORRIJOS, LLP 16 17 By: /s/ Mike Arias Mike Arias mike@asstlawyers.com Alfredo Torrijos alfredo@asstlawyers.com 6701 Center Drive West, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, California 90045-7504 Tel: 310-844-9696; Fax: 310-861-0168 18 19 20 21 LIDDLE & DUBIN, P.C. 22 23 By: /s/ Steven D. Liddle_______ Steven D. Liddle (admitted pro hac vice) sliddle@mldclassaction.com Nicholas A. Coulson (admitted pro hac vice) ncoulson@mldclassaction.com 975 E. Jefferson Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48207 Tel: 313-392-0015; Fax: 313-392-0025 24 25 26 27 28 3 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Matthew Philliben and Byron McKnight JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST 1 2 DATED: December 30, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 3 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 4 By: /s/ Andra Barmash Greene Andra Barmash Greene agreene@irell.com A. Matthew Ashley mashley@irell.com 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 Newport Beach, California 92660 Tel: 949-760-0991; Fax: 949-760-5200 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC 9 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 January 4, 2016 Dated: __________________ _________________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATION PER GENERAL ORDER NO. 45, § X-B Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, I, Robert Ahdoot, hereby certify that on December 30, 2015, Andra B. Greene authorized me to submit this Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Consolidating Cases For All Purposes And Permitting Filing Of Consolidated Complaint. 6 7 Dated: December 31, 2015 _/s/ Robert Ahdoot___________ Robert Ahdoot 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES CASE NO. 4:14-CV-05615-JST; CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00064-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?