McCLure v. Youth and Family Services of Solano County et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court, adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and the complaint is dismissed as follows: (1) Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is dismissed with leave to amend to plead additional facts, if any, describing how the conduct of each of the defendants deprived plaintiff of his liberty interest without due process of law. (2) Plaintiff's claim un der the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") is dismissed without prejudice to pleading a state law claim based on the conduct alleged therein. (3) Plaintiff's claim under the Indian Child Welfare Act ("IC WA") is dismissed with leave to amend to plead facts supporting a claim under said statute. (4) Plaintiff's claim under Title 45 of the Federal Code of Regulations is dismissed without leave to amend. (5) Given the dismissal of plaintiff 39;s federal claims, plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and may be alleged again if plaintiff elects to file a First Amended Complaint in accordance with the above or, if no such amended complaint is filed, may be brought in state court. (6) Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than May 20, 2015. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 24, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KOWAN SHAWN MCCLURE,
No. C 14-5629 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING
COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
11
v.
12
13
14
YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES OF
SOLANO COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
/
15
16
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero’s Report and
17
Recommendation, filed April 3, 2015, by which Magistrate Judge Spero recommends the
18
complaint be dismissed for failure to state a federal claim, in part with leave to amend. No
19
objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.
20
Having reviewed the matter de novo, the Court, for the reasons expressed by
21
Magistrate Judge Spero, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety,
22
and the complaint is hereby DISMISSED as follows:
23
(1) Plaintiff’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is dismissed with leave to amend to
24
plead additional facts, if any, describing how the conduct of each of the defendants
25
deprived plaintiff of his liberty interest without due process of law.
26
(2) Plaintiff’s claim under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
27
(“HIPAA”) is dismissed without prejudice to pleading a state law claim based on the
28
conduct alleged therein.
(3) Plaintiff’s claim under the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”) is dismissed with
1
2
leave to amend to plead facts supporting a claim under said statute.
(4) Plaintiff’s claim under Title 45 of the Federal Code of Regulations is dismissed
3
4
without leave to amend.
5
(5) Given the dismissal of plaintiff’s federal claims, plaintiff’s state law claims are
6
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and may be alleged again if plaintiff elects to file a First
7
Amended Complaint in accordance with the above or, if no such amended complaint is
8
filed, may be brought in state court.
(6) Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, if any, shall be filed no later than May 20,
9
10
11
2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: April 24, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?