DeSalvo v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOSEPH DESALVO, Case No. 3:14-cv-05670-SI Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Counsel for plaintiff have moved to withdraw, stating that they have been unable to contact 15 plaintiff, despite repeated efforts to do so. See Dkt. 38. Defendants do not oppose the motion. 16 Prior to the Court's granting the motion to withdraw, plaintiff's current counsel are ORDERED to 17 do the following things: 18 1. Counsel shall inform the Court of Mr. DeSalvo's mailing address. 19 2. Counsel shall send to Mr. DeSalvo, by certified mail, copies of the pleadings in this 20 case, including their motion to withdraw as counsel, together with copies of the pending MDL 21 motions, and shall explain to him the status of the MDL proceedings and the possible 22 consequences of an order from the Panel. 3. 23 Counsel shall prepare and file a declaration, served on Mr. DeSalvo and opposing 24 counsel, stating the efforts they have made to contact Mr. DeSalvo, stating that they have served 25 him with the information identified above, and attaching any evidence of same (e.g., return 26 receipts on certified mail) in their possession. 27 28 /// 1 When the Court receives the declaration identified above, it will consider granting the 2 motion to withdraw. If the motion is granted, Plaintiff DeSalvo will become pro se in this 3 litigation. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2015 7 ________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?