DeSalvo v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Filing
46
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JOSEPH DESALVO,
Case No. 3:14-cv-05670-SI
Plaintiff,
9
v.
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S COUNSELS'
MOTION TO WITHDRAW
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
BAYER HEALTHCARE
PHARMACEUTICALS INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
14
Counsel for plaintiff have moved to withdraw, stating that they have been unable to contact
15
plaintiff, despite repeated efforts to do so. See Dkt. 38. Defendants do not oppose the motion.
16
Prior to the Court's granting the motion to withdraw, plaintiff's current counsel are ORDERED to
17
do the following things:
18
1.
Counsel shall inform the Court of Mr. DeSalvo's mailing address.
19
2.
Counsel shall send to Mr. DeSalvo, by certified mail, copies of the pleadings in this
20
case, including their motion to withdraw as counsel, together with copies of the pending MDL
21
motions, and shall explain to him the status of the MDL proceedings and the possible
22
consequences of an order from the Panel.
3.
23
Counsel shall prepare and file a declaration, served on Mr. DeSalvo and opposing
24
counsel, stating the efforts they have made to contact Mr. DeSalvo, stating that they have served
25
him with the information identified above, and attaching any evidence of same (e.g., return
26
receipts on certified mail) in their possession.
27
28
///
1
When the Court receives the declaration identified above, it will consider granting the
2
motion to withdraw. If the motion is granted, Plaintiff DeSalvo will become pro se in this
3
litigation.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2015
7
________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?