Reardon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 126

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 124 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 122 Stipulation and Order, Stipulation to Extend the Page Limit for Parties' Joint Letter Brief filed by Jennifer Reilly, Justin Bartolet, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, James Lathrop. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 3, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547) hzavareei@tzlegal.com Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice) agold@tzlegal.com Andrew J. Silver (admitted pro hac vice) asilver@tzlegal.com TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 Tel.: (202) 973-0900 Fax: (202) 973-0950 Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249) ksagafi@tzlegal.com TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 483 Ninth Street, Suite 200 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel.: (510) 907-7255 Fax: (202) 973-0950 Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice) SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1120 NW Couch Street, 10th Floor Portland, OR 97209 Tel.: (503) 727-2252 Fax: (503) 346-2252 Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice) dbernard@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 131 South Dearborn, Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.: (312) 324-8559 Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES LATHROP, JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST Honorable Jon S. Tigar STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF 1 Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin 2 Bartolet (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and 3 through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on February 8, 2016, Plaintiffs and Defendant will submit a supplemental 5 joint letter brief describing any remaining discovery disputes from the December 23, 2015 joint 6 letter brief; 7 WHEREAS, the joint letter brief will address issues that are significant to the case, will 8 involve highly technical information about whether generating certain information is 9 technologically possible or feasible, and will incorporate deposition testimony, expert opinion, 10 and documents that require explanation; 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, this Court’s Civil Standing Order requires joint letter briefs to be five pages or less; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the Court would benefit from briefing that more comprehensively addresses the issues presented; and WHEREAS, the Parties request a five-page enlargement of the Court’s page limitation for joint letter briefs. 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 18 The Parties agree, subject to Court approval, to submit the supplemental joint letter brief 19 of ten pages or less that describes the remaining disputed discovery issues, where the 20 aforementioned ten pages will be single-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font and 21 includes neither the caption, which will be provided in a separate cover sheet, nor the signatures 22 of counsel, which will be provided on the eleventh page. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF 1 DATED: February 2, 2016 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 2 3 4 By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei Hassan A. Zavareei, Bar No. 181547 hzavareei@tzlegal.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 DATED: February 2, 2016 PERKINS COIE LLP 7 8 9 10 By: /s/ Debra R. Bernard Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice) DBernard@perkinscoie.com Attorney for Defendant 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 S ER R NIA Ti ga r 10 FO n S. J u d ge J o H 9 RT 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NO 7 D RDERE O OJon S. Tigar The Honorable IT IS S LI 6 DATED: February 3, 2016 UNIT ED 5 RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE PARTIES’ JOINT LETTER BRIEF 1 FILER’S ATTESTATION 2 3 4 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation. 5 6 DATED: February 2, 2016 TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Hassan A. Zavareei Hassan A. Zavareei 9 Attorney for Plaintiffs 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5FILER’S ATTESTATION 129624745.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?