Reardon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Filing
137
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 65 Case Management Conference - Further Extending Mediation Deadline filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 18154 7)
hzavareei@tzlegal.com
Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice)
agold@tzlegal.com
Andrew J. Silver (admitted pro hac vice)
asil ver@tzlegal.com
TYCKO & ZAV AREEI LLP
1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036
Tel.: (202) 973-0900
Fax: (202) 973-0950
Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249)
ksagafi@tzlegal.com
TYCKO & ZA V AREEI LLP
483 Ninth Street, Suite 200
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel.: (510) 907-7255
Fax: (202) 973-0950
Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan
Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin
Bartolet
Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)
SCrooks@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
1120 NW Couch Street, 10th Floor
Portland, OR 97209
Tel.: (503) 727-2252
Fax: (503) 346-2252
Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice)
dbernard@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
131 South Dearborn, Suite 1700
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Tel.: (312) 324-8559
Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.
20
UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT
21
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
22
23
24
JAMES LATHROP, JONATHAN
GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER
REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET on
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
25
26
27
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION
DEADLINE
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE
129927934.5
1
Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin
2
Bartolet (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and
3
through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows :
4
5
6
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2015, this Court set the mediation completion deadline as
February 29, 2016 (ECF 65);
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2016, Defendant cancelled the mediation set for February 10,
7
2016 because it believed that mediation was premature in light of the procedural posture of the
8
litigation;
9
10
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs did not want to cancel the February 10, 2016 mediation and were
prepared to move forward with the mediation before Judge Tevrizian;
11
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
12
The Parties agree, subject to Court approval, that the mediation completion deadline be
13
extended by five months from February 29, 2016 to July 29, 2016.
14
15
DATED: February 25, 2016
TYCKO AND ZAV AREEI, LLP
16
By: ยท Isl Andrea R. Gold
Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice)
agold@tzlegal.com
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
20
21
DATED: February 25, 2016
22
PERKINS COIE LLP
23
By: Isl Sarah J Crooks
Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)
SCrooks@perkinscoie.com
24
Attorneys for Defendant
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE
129927934.5
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
6
ERED
O ORD Tigar
TheIHonorable Jon S.
T IS S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ER
10
A
H
9
Ti ga r
LI
RT
8
n S.
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
7
R NIA
DATED: February 26, 2016
UNIT
ED
5
S
4
RT
U
O
2
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE
129927934.5
1
2
3
FILER'S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned
4
attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation.
5
DATED: February 25, 2016
6
PERKINS COIE LLP
By: Isl Sarah J. Crooks
Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice)
SCrooks@perkinscoie.com
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4FILER'S ATTESTATION
129927934.5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?