Reardon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 137

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 65 Case Management Conference - Further Extending Mediation Deadline filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2016)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 18154 7) hzavareei@tzlegal.com Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice) agold@tzlegal.com Andrew J. Silver (admitted pro hac vice) asil ver@tzlegal.com TYCKO & ZAV AREEI LLP 1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 Tel.: (202) 973-0900 Fax: (202) 973-0950 Kristen Law Sagafi (SBN 222249) ksagafi@tzlegal.com TYCKO & ZA V AREEI LLP 483 Ninth Street, Suite 200 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel.: (510) 907-7255 Fax: (202) 973-0950 Attorneys for Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice) SCrooks@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1120 NW Couch Street, 10th Floor Portland, OR 97209 Tel.: (503) 727-2252 Fax: (503) 346-2252 Debra R. Bernard (admitted pro hac vice) dbernard@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 131 South Dearborn, Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60603 Tel.: (312) 324-8559 Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. 20 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 21 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 23 24 JAMES LATHROP, JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 25 26 27 Plaintiffs, Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST Honorable Jon S. Tigar STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 129927934.5 1 Plaintiffs James Lathrop, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, Jennifer Reilly, and Justin 2 Bartolet (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and 3 through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate and agree as follows : 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on November 2, 2015, this Court set the mediation completion deadline as February 29, 2016 (ECF 65); WHEREAS, on January 27, 2016, Defendant cancelled the mediation set for February 10, 7 2016 because it believed that mediation was premature in light of the procedural posture of the 8 litigation; 9 10 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs did not want to cancel the February 10, 2016 mediation and were prepared to move forward with the mediation before Judge Tevrizian; 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 12 The Parties agree, subject to Court approval, that the mediation completion deadline be 13 extended by five months from February 29, 2016 to July 29, 2016. 14 15 DATED: February 25, 2016 TYCKO AND ZAV AREEI, LLP 16 By: ยท Isl Andrea R. Gold Andrea R. Gold (admitted pro hac vice) agold@tzlegal.com 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 21 DATED: February 25, 2016 22 PERKINS COIE LLP 23 By: Isl Sarah J Crooks Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice) SCrooks@perkinscoie.com 24 Attorneys for Defendant 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 129927934.5 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA 6 ERED O ORD Tigar TheIHonorable Jon S. T IS S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ER 10 A H 9 Ti ga r LI RT 8 n S. J u d ge J o FO NO 7 R NIA DATED: February 26, 2016 UNIT ED 5 S 4 RT U O 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 129927934.5 1 2 3 FILER'S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned 4 attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation. 5 DATED: February 25, 2016 6 PERKINS COIE LLP By: Isl Sarah J. Crooks Sarah J. Crooks (admitted pro hac vice) SCrooks@perkinscoie.com 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4FILER'S ATTESTATION 129927934.5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?