Reardon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Jennifer Reilly, Justin Bartolet, Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal, James Lathrop, Kerry Reardon, Julie McKinney. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/20/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Hassan A. Zavareei (SBN 181547)
[e-mail]
TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP
2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 808
Washington, DC 20036
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiffs Kerry Reardon,
James Lathrop, Julie McKinney,
Jonathan Grindell, Sandeep Pal,
Jennifer Reilly, and Justin Bartolet
LOCKE LORD LLP
Susan J. Welde (SBN: 205401)
[e-mail]
300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16

LOCKE LORD LLP
Martin Jaszczuk (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Nick J. Di Giovanni (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
111 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17

Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.

13
14
15

18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

PLAINTIFFS KERRY REARDON, JAMES
LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY,
JONATHAN GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL,
JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN
BARTOLET on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

Civil Action No. 14-cv-05678-JST
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

27
28

Defendant.
-1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Civil Action No. 14-cv-05678-JST

1

Plaintiffs KERRY REARDON, JAMES LATHROP, JULIE MCKINNEY, JONATHAN

2

GRINDELL, SANDEEP PAL, JENNIFER REILLY, and JUSTIN BARTOLET and Defendant

3

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (collectively, “the Parties”) hereby submit, through the

4

undersigned counsel of record, the following Stipulation to Continue the Case Management

5

Conference currently scheduled in this matter. In support of this stipulation, the Parties state as

6

follows:

7
8

1.

Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint on December 31, 2014. The case was initially

assigned to Judge Joseph Spero.

9

2.

On January 7, 2015, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case Management

10

Conference and ADR Deadlines. That Order set the Case Management Conference for April 3,

11

2015.

12
13

3.

Defendant’s response.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on January 30, 2015, prior to

4.

On February 18, 2015, the case was reassigned to the Honorable John S. Tigar by the

5.

On February 19, 2015, the Court set a new date for the Initial Case Management

Court.

Conference before Judge Tigar of April 22, 2015.
6.

Defendant filed its partial Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on

February 27, 2015. That Motion is now fully briefed.
7.

On March 31, 2015, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to

21

May 13, 2015. The Court also reset the deadline for the filing of the Joint Case Management

22

Statement to April 29, 2015.

23
24
25

8.

The Parties have been meeting and conferring regarding the Joint Case Management

Statement and timely filed that document on today’s date. See Docket No. 37.
9.

However, counsel for Plaintiffs is unavailable to personally attend the Initial Case

26

Management Conference now scheduled for May 13, 2015 because it is his daughter’s birthday.

27

Counsel for Plaintiffs lives in Washington, DC and is unable to travel to San Francisco on May 13,

28

2015 due to personal family commitments related to his daughter’s birthday.
-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Civil Action No. 14-cv-05678-JST

1

10.

The Parties have communicated with Judge Tigar’s Courtroom Deputy and

2

understand that the Court may be available to reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference

3

for the following Wednesday, May 20, 2015

4
5
6
7
8

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through the
undersigned, as follows:
1.

The Parties agree to continue the Initial Case Management Conference to May 20,

2015 at 2:00 pm, or another date and time agreeable to the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10

DATED: April 29, 2015

TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI, LLP

11
12

By

/s/ Hassan A. Zavareei

13

Hassan A. Zavareei

14

Attorney for Plaintiffs

15
16
17

DATED: April 29, 2015

LOCKE LORD LLP

18
19

By

20

/s/ Martin Jaszczuk
Attorney for Defendant

21

S

24
DATED: ______________
April 29, 2015

R NIA

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
__________________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

RT
-3-

ER

. Ti ga r

H

28

nS
J u d ge J o

FO

NO

27

LI

26

A

25

RT
U
O

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

22

N

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCEO
D IS T IC T
R
Civil Action No. 14-cv-05678-JST

F

C

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that
all parties have concurred in the filing of this Stipulation.

4
5
6

DATED: April 29, 2015

TYCKO AND ZAVAREEI LLP
By

/s/ Hassan A. Zavareei
Hassan A. Zavareei

7

Attorney for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Civil Action No. 14-cv-05678-JST