Reardon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 51

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend pleadings: 8/10/2015. Plaintiff's expert designation: 11/13/2015. Defendant's expert designation: 12/18/2015. Motion for class certification due: 2/12/2016. Response due: 3/11/2016. Reply due: 3/25/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/25/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 22, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

KERRY REARDON, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-05678-JST

Plaintiffs,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

August 10, 2015

Plaintiffs’ expert designation

November 13, 2015

20

Defendant’s expert designation

December 18, 2015

21

Plaintiff’s motion for class certification

February 12, 2016

22

Opposition to class certification

March 11, 2016

Reply to class certification

March 25, 2016

Further case management conference

May 25, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive motions

60 days after the order on
class certification

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2
3

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

4

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

5

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

6

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

7

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

9

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

10

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

to grant a continuance.

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 22, 2015
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2