Virnetx, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 25

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/9/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

13
14

No. C 14-80014 MISC RS

VIRNETX, INC.,

Defendants.
____________________________________/

15
16

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, VirnetX seeks review of the order issued herein by the

17

magistrate judge, contending it presents identical issues as those pending in Case No. C 14-80013

18

MISC RS. Without prejudice to any argument the opposition may wish to present that the issues are

19

not identical in the two matters, review of the two orders will be conducted in tandem. No separate

20

opposition need be filed under this case number, unless there is a contention that different issues are

21

presented here.

22
23

The pending motion to relate the two cases under Civil Local Rule 3-12 is denied as moot,
given that they are already assigned to the same judge, and referred to the same magistrate judge.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: 4/9/14
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE