Hart v. Salois

Filing 7

ORDER requiring Yahoo! to serve Plaintiff at his current address of record within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/13/2014. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WILLIAM M. HART, Plaintiff, v. SHERRY ANN SALOIS, et al., Case No.: CV 14-80015-MISC-RS (KAW) ORDER REQUIRING YAHOO! INC. TO SERVE PLAINTIFF AT HIS CURRENT ADDRESS OF RECORD Defendant(s). 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On January 22, 2014, third party Yahoo! Inc. filed a motion to quash the subpoena issued 13 by Plaintiff William M. Hart in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. (Dkt. No. 1; see 14 Hart v. Salois, 2:13-cv-00011-DAK-BCW.) On February 11, 2014, Mr. Hart was served at 324 15 Hickory Street, Apt. 8, Carinville, IL 62626. (Certificate of Service, Dkt. No. 5.) Mr. Hart, 16 however, changed his address after the subpoena was issued. Notice of Change of Address by 17 William M. Hart, Hart v. Salois, 2:13-cv-00011-DAK-BCW, ECF No. 123 (Dec. 6, 2013). Mr. 18 Hart’s current address is 4408 No. Rockwood Rd., #135, Peoria, Illinois 61615. Id. 19 Accordingly, Yahoo! is ordered to serve Mr. Hart with its motion to quash, along with a 20 copy of this order, at his current address within 14 days of this order. As of the date of service, 21 Mr. Hart will be given 14 days—plus an additional three days as provided by Civil Local Rule 7- 22 3 for mailing or other alternative service—to file an opposition in this matter with U.S. Magistrate 23 Judge Kandis A. Westmore, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 1301 Clay 24 St., Oakland, California 94612. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 13, 2014 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?