Hart v. Salois
Filing
7
ORDER requiring Yahoo! to serve Plaintiff at his current address of record within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/13/2014. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2014)
1
2
United States District Court
Northern District of California
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WILLIAM M. HART,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERRY ANN SALOIS, et al.,
Case No.: CV 14-80015-MISC-RS (KAW)
ORDER REQUIRING YAHOO! INC. TO
SERVE PLAINTIFF AT HIS CURRENT
ADDRESS OF RECORD
Defendant(s).
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On January 22, 2014, third party Yahoo! Inc. filed a motion to quash the subpoena issued
13
by Plaintiff William M. Hart in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. (Dkt. No. 1; see
14
Hart v. Salois, 2:13-cv-00011-DAK-BCW.) On February 11, 2014, Mr. Hart was served at 324
15
Hickory Street, Apt. 8, Carinville, IL 62626. (Certificate of Service, Dkt. No. 5.) Mr. Hart,
16
however, changed his address after the subpoena was issued. Notice of Change of Address by
17
William M. Hart, Hart v. Salois, 2:13-cv-00011-DAK-BCW, ECF No. 123 (Dec. 6, 2013). Mr.
18
Hart’s current address is 4408 No. Rockwood Rd., #135, Peoria, Illinois 61615. Id.
19
Accordingly, Yahoo! is ordered to serve Mr. Hart with its motion to quash, along with a
20
copy of this order, at his current address within 14 days of this order. As of the date of service,
21
Mr. Hart will be given 14 days—plus an additional three days as provided by Civil Local Rule 7-
22
3 for mailing or other alternative service—to file an opposition in this matter with U.S. Magistrate
23
Judge Kandis A. Westmore, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, 1301 Clay
24
St., Oakland, California 94612.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 13, 2014
___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?