Ou-Young v. Roberts et al

Filing 2


Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 14-80030 JSW v. JOHN G. ROBERTS, et al., ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT Defendants. / 14 15 The Court is under the obligation to pre-review the complaint filed by Kuang-Bao P. 16 Ou-Young on February 6, 2014. On December 20, 2013, in Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., C 13- 17 4442 EMC, Plaintiff was declared a vexatious litigant. Therefore, before filing any more 18 actions of a similar nature, Plaintiff must seek leave of court. The allegations in Ou-Young’s 19 complaint filed on February 6, 2014 again fail to state a claim that is cognizable. Therefore, 20 leave to file is DENIED and this matter is DISMISSED. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 26, 2014 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG, Case Number: CV14-80028 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. et al, 9 Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 12 District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on March 26, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 14 depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 17 Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young 1362 Wright Avenue 18 Sunnyvale, CA 94087 19 Dated: March 26, 2014 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?