Elliott v. Ruselin

Filing 2

ORDER FINDING COMPLAINT NOT BARRED BY PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER. These claims are not "subject of" or "related to" the claims in the Elliott v. Marsh action. Mr. Elliots current claims are therefore not barred by the pre-filing review order and he does not need leave of the Court to file it. His complaint is FILED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/03/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

VANCE S. ELLIOTT,

Case No. 14-mc-80243-WHO

Plaintiff,
8
v.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

9
10

DANIELLE RUSELIN,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 9/3/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy
in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope
in the U.S. Mail.

16
17
18
19

Vance S. Elliott
640 Eddy Street Rm 219
San Francisco, CA 94109

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: 9/3/2014
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
By:________________________
Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable WILLIAM H. ORRICK