Elliott v. Ruselin

Filing 2

ORDER FINDING COMPLAINT NOT BARRED BY PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER. These claims are not "subject of" or "related to" the claims in the Elliott v. Marsh action. Mr. Elliots current claims are therefore not barred by the pre-filing review order and he does not need leave of the Court to file it. His complaint is FILED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/03/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VANCE S. ELLIOTT, Case No. 14-mc-80243-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 10 DANIELLE RUSELIN, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 9/3/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. 16 17 18 19 Vance S. Elliott 640 Eddy Street Rm 219 San Francisco, CA 94109 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 9/3/2014 Richard W. Wieking Clerk, United States District Court By:________________________ Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable WILLIAM H. ORRICK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?