Elliott v. Ruselin
ORDER FINDING COMPLAINT NOT BARRED BY PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER. These claims are not "subject of" or "related to" the claims in the Elliott v. Marsh action. Mr. Elliots current claims are therefore not barred by the pre-filing review order and he does not need leave of the Court to file it. His complaint is FILED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/03/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VANCE S. ELLIOTT,
Case No. 14-mc-80243-WHO
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 9/3/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy
in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope
in the U.S. Mail.
Vance S. Elliott
640 Eddy Street Rm 219
San Francisco, CA 94109
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable WILLIAM H. ORRICK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?