v. Ou-Young

Filing 2

ORDER DENYING PRE-FILING REVIEW. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/18/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2014)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5

KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

No. C 14-80342 WHA

v.
JOHN G. ROBERTS, et. al.,

ORDER DENYING PRE-FILING REVIEW

Defendants.
/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
In December 2013, pro se Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young was declared a vexatious litigant, in

12

part, because of his history of suing various judicial officers, federal prosecutors, and federal

13

court personnel, in this district. See, e.g., Ou-Young v. Potter, et al., No. 10-464; Ou-Young v.

14

Vasquez, et al., No. 12-2789; Ou-Young v. Rea, et al., No. 13-3118; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al.,

15

No. 13-3676; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., No. 13-4442 (Dkt. No. 40); Ou-Young v. Roberts,

16

et al., No. 14-80017; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., No. 14-80018; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al.,

17

No. 14-80028; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., No. 14-80029; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al.,

18

No. 14-80030; Ou-Young v. Roberts, et al., No. 14-80174; Ou-Young v. Breyer, No. 14-80214;

19

Ou-Young v. Freeman, No. 14-80215; Ou-Young v. Roberts, No. 14-80306; Ou-Young v. Ives,

20

et al., No. 14-80332; Ou-Young v. Ives, et al., No. 14-80335.

21

On December 18, Mr. Ou-Young submitted a complaint for pre-filing review. The Court

22

has reviewed the complaint and finds that it does not state a cognizable claim. Indeed, Mr. Ou-

23

Young has tried to submit similar complaints on several occasions. On all prior occasions, he

24

was denied leave to file those complaints. See, e.g., Ives, No. 14-80332; Ives, No. 14-80335.

25

The Clerk shall not accept this complaint. This action is DISMISSED.

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 18, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE