Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center et al v. Hospitality Properties Trust
Filing
126
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 125 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying May 25, 2018 Order Regarding Case Schedule filed by Hospitality Properties Trust. Motion due by 8/27/2018. Responses due by 10/5/2018. Replies due by 10/19/2018. Motion Hearing set for 11/15/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 13, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Timothy P. Fox – Cal. Bar No. 157750
CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND
ENFORCEMENT CENTER
104 Broadway, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80203
(303) 757-7901
tfox@creeclaw.org
Bill Lann Lee – Cal. Bar No. 108452
CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND
ENFORCEMENT CENTER.
2120 University Ave.
Berkeley, CA 94704
(510) 431-8484
blee@creeclaw.org
Julia Campins – Cal. Bar No. 238023
Hillary Benham-Baker – Cal. Bar No.
265019
CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER
935 Moraga Road, Suite 200
Lafayette, CA 94549
(415) 373-5333
julia@campinsbenhambaker.com
hillary@campinsbenhambaker.com
Linda Dardarian – Cal Bar No. 131001
Andrew P. Lee – Cal. Bar No. 245903
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 763-9800
ldardarian@gbdhlegal.com
alee@gbdhlegal.com
10
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
[Additional Appearances on Next Page]
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
THE CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND
ENFORCEMENT CENTER, on behalf of
itself, and ANN CUPOLO-FREEMAN,
RUTHEE GOLDKORN, and KENNETH
KILGORE, on behalf of themselves and a
proposed class of similarly situated persons
defined below,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
MODIFYING MAY 25, 2018 ORDER
REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE
[Concurrently filed with [Proposed] Order]
Complaint Filed: January 15, 2015
Trial Date:
None
Judge:
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
v.
22
HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST,
23
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
34812417_1.docx
Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING
MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
OGLETREE, DEAKINS,
NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
David Raizman (State Bar No. 129407)
Kathleen J. Choi (State Bar No. 284428)
400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 438-1285
david.raizman@ogletreedeakins.com
kathleen.choi @ogletreedeakins.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Hospitality Properties Trust
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34812417_1.docx
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING
MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST
1
2
3
4
5
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, filed on July 12, 2018, and
good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiffs Ann Cupolo Freeman, Ruthee Goldkorn and Julie Reiskin (“Plaintiffs”)
shall conduct the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition described in the May 25, 2018 Order on July 25, 2018.
2.
Defendant Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) shall file and serve its proposed
6
motion for summary judgment by no later than August 27, 2018. Plaintiffs shall file and serve
7
their opposition by October 5, 2018, and HPT shall file and serve its reply by October 19, 2018.
8
9
10
11
3.
The current hearing date of October 25, 2018 on HPT’s proposed motion for
summary judgment is hereby vacated. HPT’s proposed motion for summary judgment shall be
November 15, 2018
heard on ______________________________.
4.
Plaintiffs shall file and serve their proposed motion to amend the First Amended
12
Complaint (if applicable) by no later than 20 days after the Court’s ruling on HPT’s motion for
13
summary judgment.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
July 13, 2018
Dated: _____________________
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34812417_1.docx
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING
MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?