Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center et al v. Hospitality Properties Trust

Filing 126

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 125 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying May 25, 2018 Order Regarding Case Schedule filed by Hospitality Properties Trust. Motion due by 8/27/2018. Responses due by 10/5/2018. Replies due by 10/19/2018. Motion Hearing set for 11/15/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 13, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Timothy P. Fox – Cal. Bar No. 157750 CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER 104 Broadway, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80203 (303) 757-7901 tfox@creeclaw.org Bill Lann Lee – Cal. Bar No. 108452 CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER. 2120 University Ave. Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 431-8484 blee@creeclaw.org Julia Campins – Cal. Bar No. 238023 Hillary Benham-Baker – Cal. Bar No. 265019 CAMPINS BENHAM-BAKER 935 Moraga Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, CA 94549 (415) 373-5333 julia@campinsbenhambaker.com hillary@campinsbenhambaker.com Linda Dardarian – Cal Bar No. 131001 Andrew P. Lee – Cal. Bar No. 245903 GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 763-9800 ldardarian@gbdhlegal.com alee@gbdhlegal.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 [Additional Appearances on Next Page] 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 THE CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER, on behalf of itself, and ANN CUPOLO-FREEMAN, RUTHEE GOLDKORN, and KENNETH KILGORE, on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of similarly situated persons defined below, Plaintiffs, 20 21 Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE [Concurrently filed with [Proposed] Order] Complaint Filed: January 15, 2015 Trial Date: None Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar v. 22 HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 34812417_1.docx Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. David Raizman (State Bar No. 129407) Kathleen J. Choi (State Bar No. 284428) 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 438-1285 david.raizman@ogletreedeakins.com kathleen.choi @ogletreedeakins.com Attorneys for Defendant Hospitality Properties Trust 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 34812417_1.docx 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST 1 2 3 4 5 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, filed on July 12, 2018, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Ann Cupolo Freeman, Ruthee Goldkorn and Julie Reiskin (“Plaintiffs”) shall conduct the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition described in the May 25, 2018 Order on July 25, 2018. 2. Defendant Hospitality Properties Trust (“HPT”) shall file and serve its proposed 6 motion for summary judgment by no later than August 27, 2018. Plaintiffs shall file and serve 7 their opposition by October 5, 2018, and HPT shall file and serve its reply by October 19, 2018. 8 9 10 11 3. The current hearing date of October 25, 2018 on HPT’s proposed motion for summary judgment is hereby vacated. HPT’s proposed motion for summary judgment shall be November 15, 2018 heard on ______________________________. 4. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their proposed motion to amend the First Amended 12 Complaint (if applicable) by no later than 20 days after the Court’s ruling on HPT’s motion for 13 summary judgment. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 July 13, 2018 Dated: _____________________ 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 34812417_1.docx 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING MAY 25, 2018 ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?