The Wave Studio, LLC v. Visa, Inc.

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK filed by The Wave Studio, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 19, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015)

Download PDF
1 NATE A. GARHART (CA Bar No. 196872) (nate@cobaltlaw.com) 2 VIJAY K. TOKE (CA Bar No. 215079) (vijay@cobaltlaw.com) 3 COBALT LLP 4 918 Parker Street, Bldg. A21 Berkeley, CA 94710 5 Telephone: (510) 841-9800 Facsimile: (510) 295-2401 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC, a New York 13 Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 VISA INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-100, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Case No.: 3:15-CV-00239-JST STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON Plaintiff, The Wave Studio, LLC (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Visa Inc. (“Visa”), by and 20 through their attorneys of record hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 21 The Parties stipulate that the above-captioned proceeding shall be transferred to the 22 Southern District of New York. Visa believes this case is related to litigation currently pending 23 before Hon. Cathy Seibel and Hon. Paul E. Davison of the Southern District of New York, styled 24 The Wave Studio, LLC v. General Hotel Management, et al., Case No. 7:13-cv-09239-CS-PED 25 (S.D.N.Y.)(the “GHM Action”) and should therefore be consolidated with the GHM Action. 26 Plaintiff denies this action is related to the GHM Action. The parties agree that the transfer 27 stipulated here is without prejudice as to the issue of consolidation with the GHM Action and that 28 1 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON 1 upon transfer to the Southern District of New York, Visa may seek to file a motion to consolidate 2 this action with the GHM Action. 3 THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that this action be transferred to the 4 Southern District of New York. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 DATED: June 15, 2015 COBALT LLP 7 8 By: 9 /s/ Vijay K. Toke____________ Vijay K. Toke Attorneys for Plaintiff THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC 10 11 DATED: June 15, 2015 12 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP 13 14 By: /s/ Jonathan W. Fountain_______ Jonathan W. Fountain 15 Attorneys for Defendant VISA INC. 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 21 ED ER Hon. Jon S. Tigar O ORD IT IS S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . Ti ga r LI ER H 25 / / / RT 24 / / / nS J u d ge J o FO NO 23 A 22 26 UNIT ED Dated: June 19, 2015 20 RT U O 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON 1 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE 2 3 I, Vijay K. Toke, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Plaintiff The Wave Studio, LLC, a 4 New York limited liability company, and, as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that, 5 pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), 6 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jonathan W. Fountain, the 7 above signatory. 8 9 Dated: June 15, 2015 By: /s/ Vijay K. Toke Vijay K. Toke 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?