The Wave Studio, LLC v. Visa, Inc.
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK filed by The Wave Studio, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 19, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2015)
1 NATE A. GARHART (CA Bar No. 196872)
(nate@cobaltlaw.com)
2 VIJAY K. TOKE (CA Bar No. 215079)
(vijay@cobaltlaw.com)
3
COBALT LLP
4 918 Parker Street, Bldg. A21
Berkeley, CA 94710
5 Telephone: (510) 841-9800
Facsimile: (510) 295-2401
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7 THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC, a New York
13 Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16 VISA INC., a Delaware Corporation, and DOES
1-100,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00239-JST
STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW
YORK AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
THEREON
Plaintiff, The Wave Studio, LLC (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Visa Inc. (“Visa”), by and
20 through their attorneys of record hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
21
The Parties stipulate that the above-captioned proceeding shall be transferred to the
22 Southern District of New York. Visa believes this case is related to litigation currently pending
23 before Hon. Cathy Seibel and Hon. Paul E. Davison of the Southern District of New York, styled
24 The Wave Studio, LLC v. General Hotel Management, et al., Case No. 7:13-cv-09239-CS-PED
25 (S.D.N.Y.)(the “GHM Action”) and should therefore be consolidated with the GHM Action.
26 Plaintiff denies this action is related to the GHM Action. The parties agree that the transfer
27 stipulated here is without prejudice as to the issue of consolidation with the GHM Action and that
28
1
STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER THEREON
1 upon transfer to the Southern District of New York, Visa may seek to file a motion to consolidate
2 this action with the GHM Action.
3
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that this action be transferred to the
4 Southern District of New York.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
DATED: June 15, 2015
COBALT LLP
7
8
By:
9
/s/ Vijay K. Toke____________
Vijay K. Toke
Attorneys for Plaintiff
THE WAVE STUDIO, LLC
10
11
DATED: June 15, 2015
12
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP
13
14
By:
/s/ Jonathan W. Fountain_______
Jonathan W. Fountain
15
Attorneys for Defendant
VISA INC.
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
21
ED
ER
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
O ORD
IT IS S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
. Ti ga r
LI
ER
H
25 / / /
RT
24 / / /
nS
J u d ge J o
FO
NO
23
A
22
26
UNIT
ED
Dated: June 19, 2015
20
RT
U
O
19
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER THEREON
1
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
2
3
I, Vijay K. Toke, attest that I am one of the attorneys for Plaintiff The Wave Studio, LLC, a
4 New York limited liability company, and, as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that,
5 pursuant to United States District Court, Northern District of California Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3),
6 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jonathan W. Fountain, the
7 above signatory.
8
9
Dated: June 15, 2015
By:
/s/ Vijay K. Toke
Vijay K. Toke
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AND (PROPOSED)
ORDER THEREON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?