Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al

Filing 123

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/22/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PATRICIA J. CONVEY-HINZO, et al., Case No. 15-cv-00241-WHA (JSC) Plaintiffs. 8 v. ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS 9 10 ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 This action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement 13 14 purposes. The remaining parties in this case are ordered to do the following: 1. 15 Plaintiff(s) shall make a demand in writing for settlement to each defendant on or 16 before June 5, 2015. If Plaintiff has already done so, Plaintiff shall reiterate his/her demand or 17 make a new demand. 2. 18 19 receipt of the demand. 3. 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 Following the exchange of offers and counteroffers, the parties shall negotiate in a good faith attempt to resolve the claims without further court intervention. 4. 22 23 Each defendant shall respond in writing to Plaintiff’s demand within two weeks of If the case is not resolved by the negotiations, each party shall prepare Settlement Conference Statements which must be LODGED with Judge Corley’s Chambers (NOT electronically filed) on or before June 26, 2015. Please 3-hole punch the document at the left side. Each party shall also submit their Settlement Conference Statement in .pdf format and email their statement to JSCPO@cand.uscourts.gov. 5. Upon the Court’s review of the Statements, the Court will contact the parties regarding a date for an in-person settlement conference. 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 22, 2015 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?