Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al
Filing
123
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/22/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PATRICIA J. CONVEY-HINZO, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-00241-WHA (JSC)
Plaintiffs.
8
v.
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT STATUS
9
10
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
This action has been referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement
13
14
purposes. The remaining parties in this case are ordered to do the following:
1.
15
Plaintiff(s) shall make a demand in writing for settlement to each defendant on or
16
before June 5, 2015. If Plaintiff has already done so, Plaintiff shall reiterate his/her demand or
17
make a new demand.
2.
18
19
receipt of the demand.
3.
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
Following the exchange of offers and counteroffers, the parties shall negotiate in a
good faith attempt to resolve the claims without further court intervention.
4.
22
23
Each defendant shall respond in writing to Plaintiff’s demand within two weeks of
If the case is not resolved by the negotiations, each party shall prepare Settlement
Conference Statements which must be LODGED with Judge Corley’s Chambers (NOT
electronically filed) on or before June 26, 2015. Please 3-hole punch the document at the left
side. Each party shall also submit their Settlement Conference Statement in .pdf format and email
their statement to JSCPO@cand.uscourts.gov.
5.
Upon the Court’s review of the Statements, the Court will contact the parties regarding a
date for an in-person settlement conference.
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 22, 2015
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?