Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al
Filing
210
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 205 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
FRANK D. POND (BarNo. 126191)
KEVIN D. JAMISON (Bar No. 222105)
kjamison@pondnorth.com
GAVIN D. WHITIS (BarNo. 184133)
gwhitis@pondnorth.com
ERIN N. EMPTING (Bar No. 272130)
Eempting@pondnorth.com
POND NORTH LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3300
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 617-6170
Facsimile: (213) 623-3594
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation on
behalf of its former Northern Pmnp business
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
PATRICIA J. COVEY-HINZO, individually
and as successor in interest to GILBERT E.
HINZO, Deceased, et al.,
15
Plaintiff,
16
17
Case No: 3:15-cv-00241-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Judge:
Department:
vs.
Hon. William Alsup
8
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
Removal Filed: January 20, 2015
Case Filed:
December 4, 2014
Trial Date:
April 18, 2016
20
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Patricia J. Covey-
21
22
Hinzo, individually and as successor-in-interest to Gilbert E. Hinzo, Deceased, Alex Hinzo, an
23
individual ("Plaintiffs") Complaint as to defendant FMC Corporation on behalf of its former
24
Ill
25
Ill
26
Ill
27
Ill
28
Ill
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
4710-0615:4817-2751-0575. vI
1 Northern Pump business ("Northern") is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, each party to
2
bear its own costs.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED
4
5 Dated:
March 22, 2016.
HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
4710-0615:4817-2751-0575. vI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?