Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al

Filing 210

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup granting 205 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 FRANK D. POND (BarNo. 126191) KEVIN D. JAMISON (Bar No. 222105) kjamison@pondnorth.com GAVIN D. WHITIS (BarNo. 184133) gwhitis@pondnorth.com ERIN N. EMPTING (Bar No. 272130) Eempting@pondnorth.com POND NORTH LLP 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 617-6170 Facsimile: (213) 623-3594 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant FMC Corporation on behalf of its former Northern Pmnp business 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 PATRICIA J. COVEY-HINZO, individually and as successor in interest to GILBERT E. HINZO, Deceased, et al., 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 Case No: 3:15-cv-00241-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Judge: Department: vs. Hon. William Alsup 8 ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 Removal Filed: January 20, 2015 Case Filed: December 4, 2014 Trial Date: April 18, 2016 20 Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Patricia J. Covey- 21 22 Hinzo, individually and as successor-in-interest to Gilbert E. Hinzo, Deceased, Alex Hinzo, an 23 individual ("Plaintiffs") Complaint as to defendant FMC Corporation on behalf of its former 24 Ill 25 Ill 26 Ill 27 Ill 28 Ill [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 4710-0615:4817-2751-0575. vI 1 Northern Pump business ("Northern") is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, each party to 2 bear its own costs. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED 4 5 Dated: March 22, 2016. HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT FMC CORPORATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE 4710-0615:4817-2751-0575. vI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?