Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al

Filing 46

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONSOLIDATION. Show cause by March 2 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 25, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 PATRICIA J. COVEY-HINZO, et al., 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiffs, v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONSOLIDATION Defendants. / 12 13 No. C 15-00241 WHA Plaintiffs began a wrongful-death action regarding asbestos in December 2014, in San 14 Francisco Superior Court. On January 16, 2015, defendant Ingersoll Rand Company removed to 15 federal court (Case No. 15-241). Four days later, defendant Crane Co. filed a notice of removal 16 (Case No. 15-274). On February 23, Crane filed a notice of pendency of Case No. 15-241, 17 urging consolidation of Case No. 15-241 and Case No. 15-274. 18 The parties have until MARCH 2 AT NOON, to show cause why Case No. 15-241 and 19 Case No. 15-274 should not be related and consolidated for all purposes pursuant to Civil Local 20 Rule 3-12(a) and FRCP 42. Case No. 15-241 would be the lead case. All subsequent filings 21 would be made only in the lead case and Case No. 15-274 would be administratively closed. 22 This order notes that Case No. 15-274 was reassigned to the undersigned judge on February 24, 23 so all motions filed in Case No. 15-274 (and not filed in Case No. 15-241) would need to be re- 24 noticed (and filed in the lead case). 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 25, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?