Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al

Filing 72

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING MOTION HEARING. re 26 MOTION. Case Management Conference set for 3/26/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 3, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 PATRICIA J. COVEY-HINZO, et al., 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al., Defendants. / 13 14 No. C 15-00241 WHA (Lead Case) No. C 15-00274 WHA (Consolidated Case) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING MOTION HEARING In this wrongful-death action involving asbestos, plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion for 15 leave to file a first amended complaint. No one has filed an opposition to the motion even 16 though the deadline for filing an opposition has elapsed. Many defendants have filed statements 17 of non-opposition (Case No. 15-241, Dkt. Nos. 32, 34–38, 41, 43, 53, 60; Case No. 15-274, 18 Dkt. Nos. 45–50, 52). Indeed, six defendants stated “no objection” to the proposed amendment 19 before plaintiffs filed the instant motion (Morton Decl. ¶ 12). Since plaintiffs’ motion is 20 unopposed, leave is granted when justice so requires under Rule 15(a), and the initial case 21 management conference is scheduled for March 26, the motion is hereby GRANTED. The motion 22 hearing at 8:00 a.m. is hereby VACATED. The initial case management conference is hereby 23 moved to 11:00 A.M. ON MARCH 26. A joint case management statement is due by 24 MARCH 19 AT NOON. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?