Convey-Hinzo v. Asbestos Defendants et al
Filing
72
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND VACATING MOTION HEARING. re 26 MOTION. Case Management Conference set for 3/26/2015 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 3, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
PATRICIA J. COVEY-HINZO, et al.,
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
v.
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
No. C 15-00241 WHA (Lead Case)
No. C 15-00274 WHA (Consolidated Case)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
VACATING MOTION HEARING
In this wrongful-death action involving asbestos, plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion for
15
leave to file a first amended complaint. No one has filed an opposition to the motion even
16
though the deadline for filing an opposition has elapsed. Many defendants have filed statements
17
of non-opposition (Case No. 15-241, Dkt. Nos. 32, 34–38, 41, 43, 53, 60; Case No. 15-274,
18
Dkt. Nos. 45–50, 52). Indeed, six defendants stated “no objection” to the proposed amendment
19
before plaintiffs filed the instant motion (Morton Decl. ¶ 12). Since plaintiffs’ motion is
20
unopposed, leave is granted when justice so requires under Rule 15(a), and the initial case
21
management conference is scheduled for March 26, the motion is hereby GRANTED. The motion
22
hearing at 8:00 a.m. is hereby VACATED. The initial case management conference is hereby
23
moved to 11:00 A.M. ON MARCH 26. A joint case management statement is due by
24
MARCH 19 AT NOON.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?