Ebarle et al v. LifeLock, Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY CYNTHIA RICKETTS.(whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
NAPOLEON EBARLE AND JEANNE
STAMM, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING PRO
HAC VICE APPLICATION
OF ATTORNEY CYNTHIA
RICKETTS
LIFELOCK, INC.,
Defendant
/
15
16
No. C 15-00258 WHA
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Cynthia Ricketts (Dkt. No. 15) is DENIED for
17
failing to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify
18
that “he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the
19
highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis
20
added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only
21
identifies the state of bar membership — such as “the bar of Texas” — is inadequate under the
22
local rule because it fails to identify a specific court (such as the Supreme Court of Texas).
23
While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed
24
until a corrected form is submitted.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: February 5, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?