Ebarle et al v. LifeLock, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation re 24 MOTION to Dismiss - Modifying Briefing Schedule. (terminating 26 stipulation). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LUANNE SACKS (SBN 120811) lsacks@srclaw.com SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: 415-549-0580 Facsimile: 415-549-0640 CYNTHIA A. RICKETTS (Admitted pro hac vice) cricketts@srclaw.com SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP 2800 North Central Avenue, Suite 1230 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Phone: (602) 385-3370 Fax: (602) 385-3371 Attorneys for Defendant LifeLock, Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 NAPOLEON EBARLE and JEANNE STAMM, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, vs. LIFELOCK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:15-CV-00258-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation Modifying the Briefing Schedule on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Stipulation”) and with good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall have through and including March 27, 2015, in which to file a response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 24). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have through and including April 9, 2015, in which to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 24). 13 Dated: March ___, 2015. Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge ____________________________________________________________________________________ PROPOSED ORDER CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00258-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?