Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 113

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 112 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Change Dates of Upcoming Hearings and Modify Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint filed by Hakan Yucesoy, S et/Reset Deadlines as to 112 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Change Dates of Upcoming Hearings and Modify Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, 109 MOTION to Dismiss < i>Second Amended Class Action Complaint, 94 MOTION to Compel Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Plaintiffs Morris and Sanchez. Responses due by 9/18/2015. Replies due by 10/1/2015. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/10/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289 dwongyang@gibsondunn.com MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308 mmcrae@gibsondunn.com THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289 kringdowell@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 sliss@llrlaw.com apagano@llr law.com MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242 CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 817-1470 mcarlson@carlsonlegalservices.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING behalf of all others similarly situated, HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK, Defendants. Date: October 8, 2015 Time: 1:30 pm Place: Courtroom 5 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, 2 Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants 3 Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves, and Travis Kalanick (“Defendants”) (collectively, the 4 “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Plaintiffs Morris and Sanchez is currently scheduled for October 1, 2015; WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is currently scheduled for October 8, 2015; WHEREAS, the status conference in the related case of O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Civ. A. No. 13-3826, is currently scheduled for October 22, 2015; WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agree that it would save time and expense to 12 schedule these hearings on the same date, and the Parties are available on October 15, 2015; 13 WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 14 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is currently September 11, 2015, and the deadline for 15 Defendants’ Reply is currently September 18, 2015 (Doc. 109); 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested an extension of their Response deadline, and Defendants 17 agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ Response deadline to September 18, 2015 (an additional five business 18 days), and Plaintiffs agreed to extend Defendants’ Reply deadline to October 1, 2015 (an additional 19 four business days), in light of the Parties’ agreement to move the October 8, 2015 hearing to October 20 15, 2015; 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that: (1) 21 23 24 October 1, 2015 to October 15, 2015; at 9:30 a.m. (2) 25 26 27 28 The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is continued from The hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 21 Complaint is continued from October 8, 2015 to October 15, 2015; at 9:30 a.m. (3) The deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 109) is continued to September 18, 2015, and the deadline for Defendants’ Reply is continued to October 1, 2015; and 2 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 (4) The status conference in the related case of O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 21 Civ. A. No. 13-3826, is moved from October 22, 2015 to October 15, 2015. at 9:30 a.m. 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: September 9, 2015 8 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN ADELAIDE PAGANO LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 9 MATTHEW CARLSON CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES 10 11 By: 12 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 16 17 22 THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR. DEBRA WONG YANG MARCELLUS A. MCRAE THEANE D. EVANGELIS JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA BRANDON J. STOKER KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 23 By: /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada 24 Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK 18 19 20 21 25 Dated: September 9, 2015 26 27 28 3 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (as modified above) 2 S RT In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the ER hereby attests that the A H 7 R NIA . Chen dward M Judge E filer of this document NO 6 Hon. Edward M. Chen ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO FO 5 UNIT ED 4 Date: ____________________ ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 3 9/10/15 LI 1 concurrence to the filing of this document has beenN D obtained from C other signatories hereto. O F the IS T RIC T 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CHANGE DATES OF UPCOMING HEARINGS AND MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?