Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 136

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 134 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Expediting Discovery filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

22
23
24
25
26

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

20

MATTHEW CARLSON, State Bar No. 273242
Carlson Legal Services
[e-mail]
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendants UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK

17

19

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK,

Date: November 24, 2015
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Place: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

Defendants.

27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

1
2

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan

3

Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez (“Plaintiffs”) and

4

Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”)

5

stipulate and agree as follows:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, the Court granted the Parties’ stipulation that the deposition of Plaintiff Yucesoy
shall take place on January 8, 2016, in San Francisco, CA, see Dkt. 126;
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the Parties to “meet and confer and to submit to the Court a
stipulation regarding expedited discovery” in advance of Mr. Yucesoy’s deposition, see Dkt. 125 at 2;
WHEREAS, the pleadings may not be settled in advance of the January 8, 2016 deposition of
Mr. Yucesoy;
WHEREAS, in order to complete “expedited discovery before Mr. Yucesoy’s deposition

13

takes place” in light of the Court’s order that “Defendants shall depose Mr. Yucesoy on all issues”

14

but that “Mr. Yucesoy may be subject to recall if reasonably necessary” (Dkt. 374), the Parties are

15

agreed that (1) Defendants may propound discovery on Mr. Yucesoy on or before November 20,

16

2015, based on the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint even though some of the claims in

17

the Second Amended Complaint have been dismissed, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such

18

discovery within fourteen days of service; and (2) Defendants may serve additional discovery on Mr.

19

Yucesoy within seven days after Plaintiffs file their Third Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs will

20

respond to any such discovery within fourteen days of service.

21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:

22

(1)

Defendants may propound discovery on Mr. Yucesoy based on the allegations in the

23

Second Amended Complaint by November 20, 2015, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such

24

discovery within fourteen (14) days of service; and

25

(2)

Defendants may propound additional discovery on Mr. Yucesoy within seven (7) days

26

after Plaintiffs file their Third Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs will respond to any such discovery

27

within fourteen (14) days of service.

28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED

2
3

Dated: November 17, 2015

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

4
5

By:

/s/ Theane D. Evangelis
Theane D. Evangelis

6

Attorneys for Defendants UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK

7
8
9
10

Dated: November 17, 2015

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

11
12

By:

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

13

Attorney for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI
MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN
MORRIS, and PEDRO SANCHEZ

14
15
16
17
18
19

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

RT

ER

H

27
28

R NIA

FO

NO

26

Crutcher LLP

IT IS S

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud

25

Gibson, Dunn &

D

ERE
____________________________
O ORD

11/20
Dated: ___________, 2015

LI

24

UNIT
ED

23

RT
U
O

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

3
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

C

1
2
3
4
5

ECF ATTESTATION
I, Dhananjay S. Manthripragada, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained from Theane D. Evangelis and Shannon Liss-Riordan.

By:

/s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada__
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY