Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 164

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 157 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to File Revised Third Amended Complaint filed by Hakan Yucesoy. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/23/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
[e-mail]
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated

14
15

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

16
17
18
19
20
21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on
TO FILE REVISED THIRD AMENDED
behalf of all others similarly situated,
COMPLAINT

22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs,

Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

26
27
28

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE REVISED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
CIV. A. NO. 15-00262

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy,

2

Abdi Mahammed, Mokhtar Talha, Brian Morris, and Pedro Sanchez (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant

3

Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as follows:

4

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No.

5

141), in which they did not name Travis Kalanick as a Defendant, based upon Uber’s representation

6

that Mr. Kalanick is not Uber’s “President”;

7
8
9

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has since discovered that Mr. Kalanick was listed as Uber’s
“President” in corporate filings with the California Secretary of State as recently as 2014;
WHEREAS, in light of these facts, Uber has agreed to stipulate to Plaintiffs adding Mr.

10

Kalanick back into the Third Amended Complaint as a Defendant for purposes of Plaintiffs’ Mass.

11

Gen. L. § 148B claim only, while reserving all rights and arguments with respect to Mr. Kalanick;

12
13
14

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:
(1)

The revised Third Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is hereby deemed
filed.

15
16
17

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE REVISED THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
CIV. A. NO. 15-00262

1
2

Dated: December 22, 2015

3

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
MATTHEW CARLSON
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES

4
5
6

By:

7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and PEDRO
SANCHEZ, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

8
9

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

10
11
12

Dated: December 22, 2015

13
14
15

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
DEBRA WONG YANG
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

16
17

By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
18
Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

19
20

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
12/23/15

Date: ____________________

NO

28

RT

dward
Judge E

H

ER

R NIA

27

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

n

M. Che

LI

26

UNIT
ED

25

RT
U
O

S

24

S DISTRICT
TE Hon. Edward M. Chen
C
TA

A

23

The Third Amended Complaint
shall be filed as a separate
document.

FO

21

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C