Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 213

ORDER re Objections to Proposed Class Settlement. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/22/2016. (emclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 15-cv-0262-EMC

v.

11
12

Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC

ORDER RE OBJECTIONS TO
PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants

17
18

On April 21, 2016, Plaintiffs in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies and Yucesoy v. Uber

19

Technologies moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The Court has since received

20

a number of objections. Any objector shall file or send to the Court a single document (instead of

21

multiple filings) discussing all of their concerns and objections to the settlement, which will then

22

be filed on the court docket.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: April 22, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge