Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 294

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 293 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 292 Amended Complaint Briefing Schedule filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Travis Kalanick. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/9/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
PETER C. SQUERI, SBN 286249
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

19
20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS, and
PEDRO SANCHEZ, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

21
22
23
24
25

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI MAHAMMED,
MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN MORRIS,
PEDRO SANCHEZ, ANTONIO OLIVEIRA,
and AARON DULLES, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated

Attorneys for Defendants UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK

16

18

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719
[e-mail]
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
[e-mail]
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH
AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK,
Defendants.

26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1
2

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Travis Kalanick

3

(together, “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs Hakan Yucesoy, Abdi Mahammed, Mohktar Talha, Brian

4

Morris, Pedro Sanchez, Antonio Oliveira, and Aaron Dulles (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (together with

5

Defendants, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as

6

follows:

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Fifth Amended Class Action Complaint And Jury Demand
(“Fifth Amended Complaint”) on March 30, 2018 (Dkt. 292);
WHEREAS, a hearing on Defendants’ forthcoming motion and further case management
conference is scheduled for June 14, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. (Dkt. 291);
WHEREAS, the Court ordered Defendants to respond to the Fifth Amended Complaint by
April 19, 2018 (Dkt. 287);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion is

14

currently due on May 3, 2018, and Defendants’ reply to the opposition is due on May 10, 2018;

15

WHEREAS, the Parties request modification to the hearing schedule as follows:

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Moving papers due

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Opposition papers due

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Reply papers due

Thursday, May 17, 2018

WHEREAS, the Parties request no modification to the scheduled June 14 hearing and case
management conference;
WHEREAS, under the Parties’ proposed modified schedule, the Court would have the
Parties’ moving, opposition, and reply papers for 28 days before the June 14 hearing;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, agree,
and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order establishing the following:

26

1.

Defendants shall file their moving papers on or before April 26, 2018.

27

2.

Plaintiffs shall file their opposition papers on or before May 10, 2018.

28

3.

Defendants shall file their reply papers on or before May 17, 2018.

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1
2

4.

The hearing and case management conference shall remain on calendar for June 14,

2018.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: April 6, 2018

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

7
By:

8
9

/s/ Theane D. Evangelis
Theane D. Evangelis

Attorneys for Defendants UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRAVIS
KALANICK

10
11
12

Dated: April 6, 2018

LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

13
14

By:

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan

15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiffs HAKAN YUCESOY, ABDI
MAHAMMED, MOKHTAR TALHA, BRIAN
MORRIS, PEDRO SANCHEZ, ANTONIO OLIVEIRA,
and AARON DULLES, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6
7

S
UNIT
ED

11

Chen
_____________________________________
ard M.
dge Edw
Ju
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
E United States District Judge

NO

RT

H

14
15
16

LI

13

4/9
Dated: _________________, 2018

RN

A

12

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

10

RT
U
O

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

8

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC

1

ECF ATTESTATION

2

I, Peter C. Squeri, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

3

obtained from Theane D. Evangelis and Shannon Liss-Riordan, and that this document was served

4

by electronic filing on April 6, 2018, on all counsel of record.

5
6

By:

/s/ Peter C. Squeri
Peter C. Squeri

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &

5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REVISE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-00262-EMC