Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 70 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Hakan Yucesoy, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 70 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continu e Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, 62 MOTION to Compel Arbitration. Motion Hearing reset for 8/6/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 7/30/2015. Further Case Management Conference reset for 8/6/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/23/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
DEBRA WONG YANG, SBN 123289
[e-mail]
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE, SBN 140308
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
[e-mail]
BRANDON J. STOKER, SBN 277325
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, pro hac vice
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
apagano@llr law.com

JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL, SBN 278289
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY and ABDI MAHAMMED,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MATTHEW CARLSON, SBN 273242
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES
100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22

HAKAN YUCESOY, and ABDI
MAHAMMED, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,

23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
27

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN
GRAVES, and TRAVIS KALANICK,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00262-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
Date: July 23, 2015
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 5
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Hakan

2

Yucesoy and Abdi Mahammed (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Ryan Graves,

3

and Travis Kalanick, (“Defendants”), (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree that the hearing

4

on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for July 23, 2015 be moved to

5

August 20, 2015, or alternatively, that the hearing be moved to July 16, 2015 and that Plaintiffs’

6

counsel be permitted to appear by telephone:

7
8

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration is currently scheduled
for July 23, 2015;

9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ lead counsel is scheduled to be out of the country on a long-planned
vacation, leaving from Boston on July 17, 2015, and returning to the United States on July 31, 2015;

11
WHEREAS, the Court has a hearing scheduled on a related matter (Uber’s motion to stay in
12
the cases of Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. C-14-5200 and Gillette v. Uber Technologies,
13
Inc., No. C-14-5241), for July 16, 2015;
14
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel is not able to appear in person on July 16, 2015, in San

15
16

Francisco but could appear by telephone;

17
18

WHEREAS, both sides’ counsel are already scheduled to appear before this Court on August
20, 2015, for the Case Management Conference in this case;

19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court’s approval, that:

20

(1)

21

July 23, 2015, is either moved to July 16, 2015, provided that Plaintiffs’ counsel

22

may appear by telephone, or alternatively,

23

(2)

24
25
26
27
28

The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for

The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration currently scheduled for
July 23, 2015 is moved to August 20, 2015.

///
///
///
///
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION

1
2

In accordance with Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

3
4

Dated: June 23, 2015

5

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN
ADELAIDE PAGANO
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.

6
MATTHEW CARLSON
CARLSON LEGAL SERVICES

7
8

By:

9

/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
HAKAN YUCESOY AND ABDI MAHAMMED,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Dated: June 23, 2015

THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR.
DEBRA WONG YANG
MARCELLUS A. MCRAE
THEANE D. EVANGELIS
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA
BRANDON J. STOKER
KEVIN J. RING-DOWELL
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

19

By: /s/ Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.

20

Attorneys for Defendant
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYAN GRAVES, and
TRAVIS KALANICK

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION

1
2

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

CMC is reset for 8/6/15 at 1:30 p.m. An updated joint CMC statement shall be
filed by 7/30/15. All parties must appear in person.
6/23/15

Date: ____________________

DISTRIC
TC

Hon. EdwardES Chen
T M.

8

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

en
d M. Ch

NO

9

RT

10

dwar
Judge E

ER

12

A

H

11

R NIA

7

FO

UNIT
ED

6

TA

RT
U
O

S

5

LI

4

The motion hearing and

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28